Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US SC: Teens Vs Drugs - Only A Firm Hand Works
Title:US SC: Teens Vs Drugs - Only A Firm Hand Works
Published On:2001-12-14
Source:State, The (SC)
Fetched On:2008-01-25 02:06:39
TEENS VS. DRUGS: ONLY A FIRM HAND WORKS

During the past few months, parents have asked my advice about teen-agers
who are smoking pot, using hallucinogens and/or drinking. Typically, the
parents tell me they've tried "everything," but nothing has worked. In
these parents' minds, a parental response qualifies as having "worked" only
if it ends the problem. That's a tall order. Not unrealistic, mind you,
because lots of teens have stopped substance abuse. But a tall order
requires parents who will stand tall and be willing, furthermore, to stand
tall for as long as it takes. But some teens are unimpressed by parents who
stand tall, no matter how long or tall they stand.

This is why I recommend that parents modify their objective. Instead of
trying to get the child to stop using intoxicants, I recommend they simply
try to help the child understand that choices result in consequences. On a
scale of one to 10, with 10 being the worst choice a teen-ager can possibly
make, this sort of self-destructive behavior is a nine. Therefore, the
consequence must be at least a nine, with 10 being the worst consequence
the teen can imagine.

Unfortunately, some parents will go no further than hand-wringing. When I
suggest a consequence to the ninth power, some parents just look at me like
I'm nuts. Or they tell me why they can't go that far. For example, when I
suggested to the parents of a 16-year-old drug user that they sell his car,
they stared at me a few moments, and then the mom told me that selling his
car would inconvenience her.

Never mind that she drove him around for 16 years and that there are such
things as school buses. Driving him now is an inconvenience. Never mind,
too, that it is completely unconscionable to let a child behind the wheel
of a car when said child is known to use drugs and alcohol. Apparently, at
least in this case, the inconvenience of having to drive the teen to his
necessary appointments (school, the doctor, perhaps a job) outweighs even
responsibility to one's fellow citizens.

How about turning the child and the evidence over to the police? Another
set of hand-wringers told me they "couldn't do that." In a roundabout way,
they confessed fear that their daughter might resent them for life. Unsaid,
but what I suspect, is they also fear social embarrassment. Here's a child
who is using drugs to escape reality, and parents who are afraid to hit her
over the head with it. Their primary concern is their reputation. They wish
she'd stop, but wishing and hand wringing are as far as they're willing to
go. Perhaps David Copperfield can help them.

Occasionally, my spirits are lifted by stories of parents who are willing
to stand tall, go the distance, fight the good fight - parents who are
willing to force reality on children who want no part of it. One such
couple discovered that their 16-year-old son was using pot. They found the
evidence in his room and his car. They informed him of their find. He
promised to stop. Several weeks later, they found more evidence. They
impounded his car and removed a part that is essential to ignition.

To get his car back, he had to stop all association with three accomplices,
bring his grades up to their pre-drug level and submit to weekly drug
testing. If he managed to stay clean (of said accomplices and drugs) for a
month, he would get his car back but would still have to submit to random
drug tests and maintain good grades. He got his car back. One week later,
he came home smelling like pot.

The parents said nothing. The next day, they checked with the school
counselor and discovered he was again eating lunch with a certain criminal
crowd. The parents seized his car from the school parking lot, drove it to
a used-car dealer and sold it. Can you just imagine his shock?

They will never buy him a car again, they told him. However, if he abides
by the rules and passes his drug tests for three months, they will allow
him to use one of their cars. If he earns back his driving privileges and
subsequently slips back over the line, then the next time he drives will be
in a car he buys, post-emancipation.

Said prodigal is in month two of his new life, and all seems to be going
well. But who knows what the future holds? In any case, he has learned that
his parents will not fool around with this issue. They will not wish and
wring their hands. They will stand tall and continue to do so for as long
as it takes. I invite you to join me in giving them a standing ovation.
Member Comments
No member comments available...