News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: PUB LTE: Legalizing Drugs Faces Roadblock Of Politics |
Title: | US CA: PUB LTE: Legalizing Drugs Faces Roadblock Of Politics |
Published On: | 2001-12-15 |
Source: | Santa Barbara News-Press (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-25 02:04:59 |
LEGALIZING DRUGS FACES ROADBLOCK OF POLITICS
A recent letter to the editor had some interesting points about the
decriminalization of drugs and how this would cut off much of terrorists'
funding, but there are some obstacles to this, and they have to do with
politics being the art of the possible.
One problem, faced by any politician who ran with the issue of legalizing
cocaine and heroin, is that the candidate's opponent would smother him or
her under an avalanche of motherhood and apple pie, because to be tough on
drugs lends itself so well to political posturing and grandstanding.
In the unlikely event the candidate surmounted this problem, he or she
would start getting nasty little messages from the drug cartels.
The whole drug war is a farce, of course, and as long as the drug trade is
so profitable and such glamour is associated with it, courtesy of our pop
culture, there's no rational reason to believe the flow of drugs will stop.
With huge profits to be made, drug pushers target teenagers, whose
characters haven't fully formed, certain of having customers for life.
By educating people about the dangers of tobacco, the media have managed to
make most people quit smoking.
Now that even conservatives are suggesting we consider decriminalization of
what are essentially health-education issues like liquor and tobacco, I
believe the other obstacles to legalization will soon become apparent:
Resistance by the world-class criminals, those with the most to lose. No
doubt they have many politicians in their pockets, as well as other, more
hideous ways of preventing the resolution of this mammoth problem.
Actually, three sectors would face massive losses should drugs be legalized:
The producers, the distributors and the law enforcers, both honest and
corrupt, who face loss of work, as well as loss of payoffs. In other words,
it's in the interests of the power players on both sides to oppose
legalization, while preaching the most sanctimonious twaddle.
Lastly, I would like to make it clear that I do not advocate taking drugs.
The only ones I use are the legal ones, alcohol and caffeine. I might enjoy
an occasional toke of marijuana, which is not addictive, but I refuse to
pay the exorbitant price demanded by the gangsters who now control the
trade in this relatively innocuous herb, and I don't want to risk arrest.
Robin Frost
Santa Barbara
A recent letter to the editor had some interesting points about the
decriminalization of drugs and how this would cut off much of terrorists'
funding, but there are some obstacles to this, and they have to do with
politics being the art of the possible.
One problem, faced by any politician who ran with the issue of legalizing
cocaine and heroin, is that the candidate's opponent would smother him or
her under an avalanche of motherhood and apple pie, because to be tough on
drugs lends itself so well to political posturing and grandstanding.
In the unlikely event the candidate surmounted this problem, he or she
would start getting nasty little messages from the drug cartels.
The whole drug war is a farce, of course, and as long as the drug trade is
so profitable and such glamour is associated with it, courtesy of our pop
culture, there's no rational reason to believe the flow of drugs will stop.
With huge profits to be made, drug pushers target teenagers, whose
characters haven't fully formed, certain of having customers for life.
By educating people about the dangers of tobacco, the media have managed to
make most people quit smoking.
Now that even conservatives are suggesting we consider decriminalization of
what are essentially health-education issues like liquor and tobacco, I
believe the other obstacles to legalization will soon become apparent:
Resistance by the world-class criminals, those with the most to lose. No
doubt they have many politicians in their pockets, as well as other, more
hideous ways of preventing the resolution of this mammoth problem.
Actually, three sectors would face massive losses should drugs be legalized:
The producers, the distributors and the law enforcers, both honest and
corrupt, who face loss of work, as well as loss of payoffs. In other words,
it's in the interests of the power players on both sides to oppose
legalization, while preaching the most sanctimonious twaddle.
Lastly, I would like to make it clear that I do not advocate taking drugs.
The only ones I use are the legal ones, alcohol and caffeine. I might enjoy
an occasional toke of marijuana, which is not addictive, but I refuse to
pay the exorbitant price demanded by the gangsters who now control the
trade in this relatively innocuous herb, and I don't want to risk arrest.
Robin Frost
Santa Barbara
Member Comments |
No member comments available...