News (Media Awareness Project) - US NY: PUB LTE: Student Aid Form Misleading on Pot |
Title: | US NY: PUB LTE: Student Aid Form Misleading on Pot |
Published On: | 2002-01-04 |
Source: | Daily Gazette (NY) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-25 00:45:00 |
STUDENT AID FORM MISLEADING ON POT
According to The Associated Press (Dec. 29 story), more than 43,000 college
students face possible denials of federal aid this year under a 1998 law
that bans such help to people who have drug convictions.
The ban involves a small fraction of the more than 10 million people a year
who fill out applications for federal grants, work-study funds or
subsidized loans.
Question 35 asks, "Have you ever been convicted of possessing or selling
illegal drugs?" Those who answer yes are given a second worksheet that asks
for details.
There's a cunning omission in Question 35. Applicants are not informed that
it refers to misdemeanor or felony convictions - not violations.
Many states have decriminalized marijuana, and possession of small amounts
is not a misdemeanor or felony offense. In New York, for example,
possession of 25 grams of marijuana or less is a violation; so the
applicant can correctly answer no to Question 35.
That is a salient point that should be clarified on the financial aid
questionnaire. The fact that it isn't calls into question the motives of
government officials, and raises the question: How many students were
wrongfully discouraged from applying for federal aid because of the omission?
WALTER F. WOUK, Cobleskill
According to The Associated Press (Dec. 29 story), more than 43,000 college
students face possible denials of federal aid this year under a 1998 law
that bans such help to people who have drug convictions.
The ban involves a small fraction of the more than 10 million people a year
who fill out applications for federal grants, work-study funds or
subsidized loans.
Question 35 asks, "Have you ever been convicted of possessing or selling
illegal drugs?" Those who answer yes are given a second worksheet that asks
for details.
There's a cunning omission in Question 35. Applicants are not informed that
it refers to misdemeanor or felony convictions - not violations.
Many states have decriminalized marijuana, and possession of small amounts
is not a misdemeanor or felony offense. In New York, for example,
possession of 25 grams of marijuana or less is a violation; so the
applicant can correctly answer no to Question 35.
That is a salient point that should be clarified on the financial aid
questionnaire. The fact that it isn't calls into question the motives of
government officials, and raises the question: How many students were
wrongfully discouraged from applying for federal aid because of the omission?
WALTER F. WOUK, Cobleskill
Member Comments |
No member comments available...