News (Media Awareness Project) - US: Web: Column: When The Drug War Ends |
Title: | US: Web: Column: When The Drug War Ends |
Published On: | 2002-03-11 |
Source: | WorldNetDaily (US Web) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-24 17:56:01 |
WHEN THE DRUG WAR ENDS
It's Inevitable.
Some day soon, Americans are going to recognize the U.S. government's war on
drugs has been a total, unequivocal disaster.
I have explained the failed prohibitionist policy before, as have
WorldNetDaily columnists Joel Miller, Harry Browne and others.
Like most government initiatives, the war on drugs has only exacerbated our
problems - increasing crime, infringing civil rights, soaking taxpayers and
just generally making a bigger mess of things.
Let's hope it's sooner rather than later.
Let's also hope Americans are able to change the government's direction for
the better when they realize what is happening.
How would we change the government's direction for the better? Well, let's
start with a model we should not follow.
Earlier this month, Scotland's "drug czar" declared defeat in that country's
war on drugs. Deputy Justice Minister Richard Simpson said he recognizes the
government is worsening the country's crime problem by driving up the cost
of drugs and driving addicts to robbery to feed their habits.
"The only time you will hear me use terms such as 'war on drugs' and 'just
say no' is to denigrate them," he told the Sunday Herald.
But - and here's the danger Americans will face when they come to the same
realization - the government in Scotland is simply changing tactics. It is
about to embark on a whole new drug war by a different name - one that could
prove more costly and more counter-productive than the failed policies of
zero tolerance.
Now the Scottish government is going to shift focus toward drug education
that sounds remarkably like the failed sex-education programs in the U.S.
"I've never used the term 'teach children how to take drugs,' but what I
would say is that we need to provide them with information," said Simpson.
"We need to say, 'We'd rather you didn't take ecstasy, but if you make that
decision, here are the risks.' We have to give them all the information they
need to take responsibility for themselves."
The government will also increase funding of methadone programs to hook
heroin addicts on a new drug.
Giving mixed signals to kids is not the right approach. Neither is
reallocating taxpayer dollars extorted from citizens under false pretenses.
That's what government inevitably will do if it is permitted to lead a new
failed initiative against drugs.
There are better ways to address the drug problem - which is really not a
drug problem at all but a moral and social crisis hitting western societies
that have drifted far from the Judeo-Christian underpinnings that created
them.
Government can never take the lead in solving that crisis. It can only be
addressed effectively by the churches and the synagogues - whose primary
role setting standards of behavior and in charity and social care has been
usurped by government.
Take God out of the equation and, for many, the question of sin becomes,
"why not?" The only way the government can answer the question "why not?" is
with force and violence. If we've learned one thing in the last 30 years, it
should be that government is not and can never be compassionate. It does not
work that way. When it tries, it fails. Individuals can effectively express
compassion. Churches and synagogues can effectively express compassion.
Families can effectively express compassion. Sometimes even small
communities can effectively express compassion and positively change
people's errant behavior.
Washington cannot.
The drug war, indeed, needs to be ended, but not this way - not with more
failed programs of centralized authority.
First, we need to take the profit motive away from the smugglers, street
criminals and drug lords. This can be accomplished by selling narcotics
through pharmacies by prescription to adults at a small markup over cost.
Second, the regulations over drug sales need to be made much closer to home.
States and local communities can do a much better job than Washington - as
they can with most programs.
Third - and this is the most important step of all - it's time for the
remnant of religious people to shoulder some responsibility. They need to
emerge from their own haze of confusion and begin asserting their moral
authority by teaching people right from wrong, again. This will not only
have beneficial effects in the drug crisis, it is an absolute necessity for
free, self-governing people to remain free, self-governing people.
Joseph Farah is editor and chief executive officer of WorldNetDaily.com and
writes a daily column. Get an autographed, first-edition copy of Joseph
Farah's 1996 book, "This Land Is Our Land," published by St. Martin's Press.
It's Inevitable.
Some day soon, Americans are going to recognize the U.S. government's war on
drugs has been a total, unequivocal disaster.
I have explained the failed prohibitionist policy before, as have
WorldNetDaily columnists Joel Miller, Harry Browne and others.
Like most government initiatives, the war on drugs has only exacerbated our
problems - increasing crime, infringing civil rights, soaking taxpayers and
just generally making a bigger mess of things.
Let's hope it's sooner rather than later.
Let's also hope Americans are able to change the government's direction for
the better when they realize what is happening.
How would we change the government's direction for the better? Well, let's
start with a model we should not follow.
Earlier this month, Scotland's "drug czar" declared defeat in that country's
war on drugs. Deputy Justice Minister Richard Simpson said he recognizes the
government is worsening the country's crime problem by driving up the cost
of drugs and driving addicts to robbery to feed their habits.
"The only time you will hear me use terms such as 'war on drugs' and 'just
say no' is to denigrate them," he told the Sunday Herald.
But - and here's the danger Americans will face when they come to the same
realization - the government in Scotland is simply changing tactics. It is
about to embark on a whole new drug war by a different name - one that could
prove more costly and more counter-productive than the failed policies of
zero tolerance.
Now the Scottish government is going to shift focus toward drug education
that sounds remarkably like the failed sex-education programs in the U.S.
"I've never used the term 'teach children how to take drugs,' but what I
would say is that we need to provide them with information," said Simpson.
"We need to say, 'We'd rather you didn't take ecstasy, but if you make that
decision, here are the risks.' We have to give them all the information they
need to take responsibility for themselves."
The government will also increase funding of methadone programs to hook
heroin addicts on a new drug.
Giving mixed signals to kids is not the right approach. Neither is
reallocating taxpayer dollars extorted from citizens under false pretenses.
That's what government inevitably will do if it is permitted to lead a new
failed initiative against drugs.
There are better ways to address the drug problem - which is really not a
drug problem at all but a moral and social crisis hitting western societies
that have drifted far from the Judeo-Christian underpinnings that created
them.
Government can never take the lead in solving that crisis. It can only be
addressed effectively by the churches and the synagogues - whose primary
role setting standards of behavior and in charity and social care has been
usurped by government.
Take God out of the equation and, for many, the question of sin becomes,
"why not?" The only way the government can answer the question "why not?" is
with force and violence. If we've learned one thing in the last 30 years, it
should be that government is not and can never be compassionate. It does not
work that way. When it tries, it fails. Individuals can effectively express
compassion. Churches and synagogues can effectively express compassion.
Families can effectively express compassion. Sometimes even small
communities can effectively express compassion and positively change
people's errant behavior.
Washington cannot.
The drug war, indeed, needs to be ended, but not this way - not with more
failed programs of centralized authority.
First, we need to take the profit motive away from the smugglers, street
criminals and drug lords. This can be accomplished by selling narcotics
through pharmacies by prescription to adults at a small markup over cost.
Second, the regulations over drug sales need to be made much closer to home.
States and local communities can do a much better job than Washington - as
they can with most programs.
Third - and this is the most important step of all - it's time for the
remnant of religious people to shoulder some responsibility. They need to
emerge from their own haze of confusion and begin asserting their moral
authority by teaching people right from wrong, again. This will not only
have beneficial effects in the drug crisis, it is an absolute necessity for
free, self-governing people to remain free, self-governing people.
Joseph Farah is editor and chief executive officer of WorldNetDaily.com and
writes a daily column. Get an autographed, first-edition copy of Joseph
Farah's 1996 book, "This Land Is Our Land," published by St. Martin's Press.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...