News (Media Awareness Project) - US: PUB LTE: Drug Prohibition The Wrong Way To Go |
Title: | US: PUB LTE: Drug Prohibition The Wrong Way To Go |
Published On: | 2002-04-24 |
Source: | Whitecourt Star (CN AB) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-23 11:40:27 |
DRUG PROHIBITION THE WRONG WAY TO GO
Re From Users To Traffickers - Eyes Need To Be Opened, Apr. 17
I have a few questions about your evident support of drug prohibition.
1. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms implies that citizens have the right
to pursue their own form of happiness so long as they hurt no one else.
Thus it seems Canadians have the right to ingest any drug, however harmful.
Why do you feel the government has the right to punish individuals for what
they choose to ingest into their own bodies and jail those who supply them?
2. If drugs are banned because they are harmful to users, why, then, are
tobacco and alcohol not banned? Doesn't this seem unfair to those who
prefer illegal drugs? If we ban one harmful drug, shouldn't we ban all
harmful drugs?
3. Is it not true that, far from protecting users from harm, banning a drug
harms them much more than would otherwise be the case because it cuts them
off from access to drugs of known potency and purity? Weren't thousands of
Americans poisoned or blinded by adulterated alcohol during Prohibition.
Didn't the problems vanish when alcohol was legalized again?
4. Many have characterized drug prohibition as nothing less than a
Hitler-like government pogrom designed, first to ostracize, and then, to
annihilate an identifiable minority of innocent people. Why do think it's not?
5. The 1973 Le Dain Commission concluded, "There appears to be little
permanent physiological damage from chronic use of pure opiate narcotics."
Why, then, ban heroin?
6. If prohibition is so great, why did America give up on the prohibition
of alcohol?
7. Is it not true that if drugs and prostitution were legalized, the power
of the Hells Angels would be severely curtailed? After all, Prohibition
created Al Capone, not the other way around.
8. Is it not true that if marijuana were legalized, marijuana grow
operations would be no more dangerous, do no more damage and steal no more
hydro than the average tomato grow operation?
For me, there is no more reason to punish drug users and dealers today than
there was in the past to hang witches, lynch blacks, incarcerate Japanese
Canadians or gas Jews.
No, I don't have too much respect for politicians or the police these days
- - or the media.
Alan Randell
Victoria
Re From Users To Traffickers - Eyes Need To Be Opened, Apr. 17
I have a few questions about your evident support of drug prohibition.
1. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms implies that citizens have the right
to pursue their own form of happiness so long as they hurt no one else.
Thus it seems Canadians have the right to ingest any drug, however harmful.
Why do you feel the government has the right to punish individuals for what
they choose to ingest into their own bodies and jail those who supply them?
2. If drugs are banned because they are harmful to users, why, then, are
tobacco and alcohol not banned? Doesn't this seem unfair to those who
prefer illegal drugs? If we ban one harmful drug, shouldn't we ban all
harmful drugs?
3. Is it not true that, far from protecting users from harm, banning a drug
harms them much more than would otherwise be the case because it cuts them
off from access to drugs of known potency and purity? Weren't thousands of
Americans poisoned or blinded by adulterated alcohol during Prohibition.
Didn't the problems vanish when alcohol was legalized again?
4. Many have characterized drug prohibition as nothing less than a
Hitler-like government pogrom designed, first to ostracize, and then, to
annihilate an identifiable minority of innocent people. Why do think it's not?
5. The 1973 Le Dain Commission concluded, "There appears to be little
permanent physiological damage from chronic use of pure opiate narcotics."
Why, then, ban heroin?
6. If prohibition is so great, why did America give up on the prohibition
of alcohol?
7. Is it not true that if drugs and prostitution were legalized, the power
of the Hells Angels would be severely curtailed? After all, Prohibition
created Al Capone, not the other way around.
8. Is it not true that if marijuana were legalized, marijuana grow
operations would be no more dangerous, do no more damage and steal no more
hydro than the average tomato grow operation?
For me, there is no more reason to punish drug users and dealers today than
there was in the past to hang witches, lynch blacks, incarcerate Japanese
Canadians or gas Jews.
No, I don't have too much respect for politicians or the police these days
- - or the media.
Alan Randell
Victoria
Member Comments |
No member comments available...