HIGHER LEARNING

Campus Drug Wars

AT A RECENT drug legalization rally at the University of California at Los
Angeles, defiant students smoked joints on the grass. Meanwhile, sober
administrators circulated yellow flyers warning that drug convictions are
grounds for denial of federal financial aid.

Not if activist students have their way. The law in question--an amendment
to the Higher Education Act of 1998 that took effect in July 2000--is under
grassroots attack on campuses across America. Aside from raising awareness
and lobbying Congress to strike down the provision, a handful of activists
have also convinced their schools to set aside money in case a prospective
student is denied aid under the provision.

"It's antithetical to deny people education if we seek to make them
responsible and contributing adults," says Aaron Marcus, one of two
Hampshire College students who in 1999 spearheaded a successful effort to
set aside $10,000 from the university's annual budget, creating the first
fund of its kind.

At least three other schools have established such funds. These include the
private institutions Yale University (which announced its fund in April) and
Swarthmore College as well as Western Washington University, a state school
in Bellingham where the student association raised $750 by selling ads in a
discount coupon book. "There's no taxpayer or private donor money in it,"
the association's president explained in a press release.

Marcus, now a law student at the University of Minnesota, is on the board of
an organization called Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP), designed to
promote "open, honest, and rational discussion of alternatives to our
nation's drug problem," he says. The student governments of 67 colleges and
universities across the country have signed SSDP's resolution asking
Congress to repeal the aid provision. The group has an online petition at
www.raiseyourvoice.com .

Rep. Barney Frank (D Mass.), along with 23 co sponsors, has drafted a bill
to overturn the law. "The authorities previously had the discretion to bar
aid to people based on the severity of their crime and whether they are
taking steps to rehabilitate themselves," Frank said at a 2001 press
conference. "My bill would simply restore that discretion."