News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: PUB LTE: Stirring The Domestic Pot |
Title: | CN BC: PUB LTE: Stirring The Domestic Pot |
Published On: | 2002-06-26 |
Source: | Victoria Times-Colonist (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-23 03:38:33 |
STIRRING THE DOMESTIC POT
I do not condone non-medical drug use, illegal or otherwise, but the
primary concern of governments seems to be economic growth. Most drug money
is laundered through "respectable" businesses, which carefully look the
other way.
The present punitive practices regarding drug use supports organized crime,
corrupts police forces, destroys more lives than the drug use itself, and
makes otherwise ethical real estate dealers pretend that they are not
suspicious when someone with little apparent income pays cash for a house.
But our drug policies keep judges and police employed and stimulate the
economy.
More rational policies toward drugs might generate tax revenue, reduce the
duplicity at banks and brokerage firms, and lessen the deceit involved in
many real estate deals.
The controlled legal distribution of pot would not solve problems
associated with use, but current money launderers would not have to pretend
that they see nothing. They could behave morally. Cigarette manufacturers
and marijuana growers would be on the same footing.
And since we are obsessed with economic indicators, we could openly add
these numbers to the gross domestic product.
Prostitutes distribute their earnings just as efficiently as opera singers.
Gordon Campbell must be pleased that marijuana and money laundering is
filling in the gap left by unemployed loggers, teachers, and government
employees.
Jim Hackler,
University of Victoria.
I do not condone non-medical drug use, illegal or otherwise, but the
primary concern of governments seems to be economic growth. Most drug money
is laundered through "respectable" businesses, which carefully look the
other way.
The present punitive practices regarding drug use supports organized crime,
corrupts police forces, destroys more lives than the drug use itself, and
makes otherwise ethical real estate dealers pretend that they are not
suspicious when someone with little apparent income pays cash for a house.
But our drug policies keep judges and police employed and stimulate the
economy.
More rational policies toward drugs might generate tax revenue, reduce the
duplicity at banks and brokerage firms, and lessen the deceit involved in
many real estate deals.
The controlled legal distribution of pot would not solve problems
associated with use, but current money launderers would not have to pretend
that they see nothing. They could behave morally. Cigarette manufacturers
and marijuana growers would be on the same footing.
And since we are obsessed with economic indicators, we could openly add
these numbers to the gross domestic product.
Prostitutes distribute their earnings just as efficiently as opera singers.
Gordon Campbell must be pleased that marijuana and money laundering is
filling in the gap left by unemployed loggers, teachers, and government
employees.
Jim Hackler,
University of Victoria.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...