News (Media Awareness Project) - US IL: PUB LTE: Parents Who Oppose Drug Test Have Few Options |
Title: | US IL: PUB LTE: Parents Who Oppose Drug Test Have Few Options |
Published On: | 2002-07-10 |
Source: | Chicago Tribune (IL) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-23 00:10:00 |
PARENTS WHO OPPOSE DRUG TEST HAVE FEW OPTIONS
James B. Gierach
Oak Lawn -- The U.S. Supreme Court has expanded the right of school
officials to drug test the schoolchildren of America ("Wider school drug
tests upheld," Page 1, June 28). The court ruling will allow testing of
students as a condition to their participation in extracurricular
activities, and the testing may be compelled without any reasonable ground
to believe that a student has used or is using drugs, the constitutional
standard for searches and seizures of people and places, a standard
commonly known as "probable cause."
The 5-4 decision expanded a 1995 decision of the high court that allowed
school officials to randomly test junior high and high school athletes in
schools with serious drug problems.
This latest drug-war tool has been fashioned by the judicial branch of
government, a branch that has repeatedly proven its fealty to the drug war
by eroding constitutional rights and liberties formerly protected by the
Bill of Rights.
The drug-war guilt on the hands of the high court is a probationable
offense in comparison to that of the other two branches of government,
where officials must regularly pander to the public for votes in order to
be elected and re-elected.
After all, it is the executive and legislative branches of government that
have brought 21st Century Americans, directly or indirectly, zero-tolerance
policies, drug-free zones, "just say no" campaigns, drug-war foreign aid,
harsher penalties, prison overcrowding, a medieval prison construction
boom, lottery school-finding, drug- testing in the workplace, school metal
detectors, military-style drug raids on homes and businesses, asset
forfeiture, D.A.R.E. drug- instruction in the classroom, and the
pseudo-virtues of intolerance and informant-based law-enforcement.
What are parents who disagree with the drug-testing of their kids to do?
Write their congressmen?
Parents have few choices: Run for the school board, love it or leave it,
pull the kid out of school-sponsored activities, start a home school, move
to another school district.
No, all of these choices are either impractical or punishing.
James B. Gierach
Oak Lawn -- The U.S. Supreme Court has expanded the right of school
officials to drug test the schoolchildren of America ("Wider school drug
tests upheld," Page 1, June 28). The court ruling will allow testing of
students as a condition to their participation in extracurricular
activities, and the testing may be compelled without any reasonable ground
to believe that a student has used or is using drugs, the constitutional
standard for searches and seizures of people and places, a standard
commonly known as "probable cause."
The 5-4 decision expanded a 1995 decision of the high court that allowed
school officials to randomly test junior high and high school athletes in
schools with serious drug problems.
This latest drug-war tool has been fashioned by the judicial branch of
government, a branch that has repeatedly proven its fealty to the drug war
by eroding constitutional rights and liberties formerly protected by the
Bill of Rights.
The drug-war guilt on the hands of the high court is a probationable
offense in comparison to that of the other two branches of government,
where officials must regularly pander to the public for votes in order to
be elected and re-elected.
After all, it is the executive and legislative branches of government that
have brought 21st Century Americans, directly or indirectly, zero-tolerance
policies, drug-free zones, "just say no" campaigns, drug-war foreign aid,
harsher penalties, prison overcrowding, a medieval prison construction
boom, lottery school-finding, drug- testing in the workplace, school metal
detectors, military-style drug raids on homes and businesses, asset
forfeiture, D.A.R.E. drug- instruction in the classroom, and the
pseudo-virtues of intolerance and informant-based law-enforcement.
What are parents who disagree with the drug-testing of their kids to do?
Write their congressmen?
Parents have few choices: Run for the school board, love it or leave it,
pull the kid out of school-sponsored activities, start a home school, move
to another school district.
No, all of these choices are either impractical or punishing.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...