News (Media Awareness Project) - US NC: All Cheek Road Drug Raid Charges Dropped |
Title: | US NC: All Cheek Road Drug Raid Charges Dropped |
Published On: | 2002-07-13 |
Source: | Herald-Sun, The (Durham, NC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-22 23:43:03 |
ALL CHEEK ROAD DRUG RAID CHARGES DROPPED
DURHAM -- Criminal charges are being dropped in a Cheek Road drug raid that
was found by a judge to be unconstitutional and partially illegal, court
officials confirmed Friday.
For defendants who already have pleaded guilty, the district attorney will
not oppose a reversal of the convictions, officials said.
"This sounds like good news to me," said Public Defender Bob Brown, whose
office represents six of the suspects. "It's more than I had hoped for. In
fact, it's much more than I hoped for. I certainly appreciate the DA's
willingness to pursue justice."
On Wednesday, Superior Court Judge Orlando F. Hudson said the February
police raid at Cheek Road Apartments was unconstitutional because officers
improperly "seized" the entire neighborhood and conducted "unreasonable"
searches and seizures.
The behavior of some officers amounted to "criminal conduct," Hudson added.
The two-day raid was dubbed Operation TAPS, standing for The Aggressive
Police Strategy. It involved more than 100 Durham officers, two National
Guard helicopters, 10 State Bureau of Investigation agents and other
law-enforcement resources.
Officers seized an undisclosed amount of heroin, cocaine and marijuana,
along with two pistols.
The cost of the operation has not been revealed.
Thirty-five arrests and 65 citations resulted.
Some residents promptly complained that police were unnecessarily brutal,
and that officers even tackled a 13-year-old boy and held a gun to his head
for no apparent reason.
On the other hand, an unidentified resident said on television that she
thought the raid was good because it might help rid her neighborhood of
drugs and guns.
Police consistently maintained they did nothing wrong or unconstitutional.
After watching a lengthy videotape of the raid, Senior Police Attorney
Arnetta J. Herring said Wednesday that officers conducted themselves in "a
very fine and upstanding" manner.
DURHAM -- Criminal charges are being dropped in a Cheek Road drug raid that
was found by a judge to be unconstitutional and partially illegal, court
officials confirmed Friday.
For defendants who already have pleaded guilty, the district attorney will
not oppose a reversal of the convictions, officials said.
"This sounds like good news to me," said Public Defender Bob Brown, whose
office represents six of the suspects. "It's more than I had hoped for. In
fact, it's much more than I hoped for. I certainly appreciate the DA's
willingness to pursue justice."
On Wednesday, Superior Court Judge Orlando F. Hudson said the February
police raid at Cheek Road Apartments was unconstitutional because officers
improperly "seized" the entire neighborhood and conducted "unreasonable"
searches and seizures.
The behavior of some officers amounted to "criminal conduct," Hudson added.
The two-day raid was dubbed Operation TAPS, standing for The Aggressive
Police Strategy. It involved more than 100 Durham officers, two National
Guard helicopters, 10 State Bureau of Investigation agents and other
law-enforcement resources.
Officers seized an undisclosed amount of heroin, cocaine and marijuana,
along with two pistols.
The cost of the operation has not been revealed.
Thirty-five arrests and 65 citations resulted.
Some residents promptly complained that police were unnecessarily brutal,
and that officers even tackled a 13-year-old boy and held a gun to his head
for no apparent reason.
On the other hand, an unidentified resident said on television that she
thought the raid was good because it might help rid her neighborhood of
drugs and guns.
Police consistently maintained they did nothing wrong or unconstitutional.
After watching a lengthy videotape of the raid, Senior Police Attorney
Arnetta J. Herring said Wednesday that officers conducted themselves in "a
very fine and upstanding" manner.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...