News (Media Awareness Project) - US VA: PUB LTE: When Will Virginia Start Testing Students? |
Title: | US VA: PUB LTE: When Will Virginia Start Testing Students? |
Published On: | 2002-07-13 |
Source: | Richmond Times-Dispatch (VA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-22 23:41:08 |
WHEN WILL VIRGINIA START TESTING STUDENTS?
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Regarding the article, "No Drug-Test Plans in Local
Schools," the Times-Dispatch probably should have waited a few months
before making such a statement. The ink hasn't even dried on the majority
opinion that schools may collect urine samples for participants in all
student activities. The fact that they now can most likely means that one
day they will.
Such is the nature of new tolerances to eroding constitutional protections.
Today's extreme example from Oklahoma is upheld, and becomes tomorrow's
norm throughout the nation.
Furthermore, that majority opinion does seem to open the door for testing
of all students. The Court seems more interested in the perceived good that
might result from urinalysis than it does with the violation of privacy,
regardless of whether the student is a member of the chess club or not.
Someone will make the legal argument, perhaps here in the Old Dominion,
perhaps somewhere else. It will go to the Supreme Court. And then, long
after we've grown accustomed to drug testing for extracurricular
activities, the T-D will respond to the future Court ruling with an article
about how Virginia schools don't have any plans for universal sweeps.
My only question is whether the funding to pay for all this testing will
come from increases in my state income tax, sales tax, property tax, or
personal-property tax.
PAUL MILLER
Woodbridge
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Regarding the article, "No Drug-Test Plans in Local
Schools," the Times-Dispatch probably should have waited a few months
before making such a statement. The ink hasn't even dried on the majority
opinion that schools may collect urine samples for participants in all
student activities. The fact that they now can most likely means that one
day they will.
Such is the nature of new tolerances to eroding constitutional protections.
Today's extreme example from Oklahoma is upheld, and becomes tomorrow's
norm throughout the nation.
Furthermore, that majority opinion does seem to open the door for testing
of all students. The Court seems more interested in the perceived good that
might result from urinalysis than it does with the violation of privacy,
regardless of whether the student is a member of the chess club or not.
Someone will make the legal argument, perhaps here in the Old Dominion,
perhaps somewhere else. It will go to the Supreme Court. And then, long
after we've grown accustomed to drug testing for extracurricular
activities, the T-D will respond to the future Court ruling with an article
about how Virginia schools don't have any plans for universal sweeps.
My only question is whether the funding to pay for all this testing will
come from increases in my state income tax, sales tax, property tax, or
personal-property tax.
PAUL MILLER
Woodbridge
Member Comments |
No member comments available...