News (Media Awareness Project) - UK: Toothpick Test Turns Cellphones Into A Drug Dealer's Worst |
Title: | UK: Toothpick Test Turns Cellphones Into A Drug Dealer's Worst |
Published On: | 2002-07-20 |
Source: | New Scientist (UK) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-22 22:18:06 |
TOOTHPICK TEST TURNS CELLPHONES
Into A Drug Dealer's Worst Enemy
IT'S BECOME an essential tool for drug dealers, but the mobile phone could
also prove their downfall. And wiping incriminating calls from the phone's
memory won't help. It's the gunk between the buttons the police are after.
The many tiny crevices on a cellphone can harbour drug particles if the
user has been in regular contact with them. But until recently, no one knew
if a cellphone could be innocently contaminated with drugs. Since cocaine
traces are present on 99 per cent of British bank notes, it's possible that
phones are easily tainted.
Now forensic scientists have shown that the drug contamination on a
dealer's or a heavy user's cellphone is much higher than you would find by
chance.
Neil Ronan and his colleagues at Mass Spec Analytical in Bristol checked
out 150 handsets to see how often they harboured traces of drugs. Most were
old phones ditched by people upgrading to newer models, but some came from
police drug squad officers.
The researchers used a toothpick to delve into seven parts of each phone,
including down the side of the most frequently used buttons. Only 5 per
cent of handsets were positive for cocaine, heroin and ecstasy, while none
showed traces of cannabis. The phones that were innocently contaminated
tended to have deposits at only one point, but the phones of people who had
recently handled drugs typically had traces all over them. This will help
forensic teams differentiate between likely dealers and innocent people,
Ronan says.
Compared with other personal items celiphones have lots of nooks and
crannies, so if the same trace signatures are found all over it, it's
pretty hard to explain away as chance. "Before, I could just say that drugs
were there," says Ronan. Now he can say what that means. But such trace
evidence on its own will not support a conviction. It simply helps build up
a picture of the defendant, he said at a Royal Society of Chemistry
forensics conference in Lincoln last week.
Into A Drug Dealer's Worst Enemy
IT'S BECOME an essential tool for drug dealers, but the mobile phone could
also prove their downfall. And wiping incriminating calls from the phone's
memory won't help. It's the gunk between the buttons the police are after.
The many tiny crevices on a cellphone can harbour drug particles if the
user has been in regular contact with them. But until recently, no one knew
if a cellphone could be innocently contaminated with drugs. Since cocaine
traces are present on 99 per cent of British bank notes, it's possible that
phones are easily tainted.
Now forensic scientists have shown that the drug contamination on a
dealer's or a heavy user's cellphone is much higher than you would find by
chance.
Neil Ronan and his colleagues at Mass Spec Analytical in Bristol checked
out 150 handsets to see how often they harboured traces of drugs. Most were
old phones ditched by people upgrading to newer models, but some came from
police drug squad officers.
The researchers used a toothpick to delve into seven parts of each phone,
including down the side of the most frequently used buttons. Only 5 per
cent of handsets were positive for cocaine, heroin and ecstasy, while none
showed traces of cannabis. The phones that were innocently contaminated
tended to have deposits at only one point, but the phones of people who had
recently handled drugs typically had traces all over them. This will help
forensic teams differentiate between likely dealers and innocent people,
Ronan says.
Compared with other personal items celiphones have lots of nooks and
crannies, so if the same trace signatures are found all over it, it's
pretty hard to explain away as chance. "Before, I could just say that drugs
were there," says Ronan. Now he can say what that means. But such trace
evidence on its own will not support a conviction. It simply helps build up
a picture of the defendant, he said at a Royal Society of Chemistry
forensics conference in Lincoln last week.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...