News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: LTE: Police And Dogs Should Be Welcome |
Title: | CN BC: LTE: Police And Dogs Should Be Welcome |
Published On: | 2002-08-08 |
Source: | Victoria Times-Colonist (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-22 21:01:32 |
POLICE AND DOGS SHOULD BE WELCOME
I am afraid I cannot agree that using police dogs to search vehicles on the
ferry for drugs was an unwarranted invasion of our privacy.
If the report be accurate, that warrants were obtained (via Internet, I
assume) on the evidence of odours found by trained dogs, and that only
those cars so identified were searched, then there was nothing done wrong
- -- unless it be that all attempts to stop crimes before they get away are
wrong, and that a police constable can only act, either on the evidence of
his own observations, or on credible sworn complaints from others.
In that the police were targeting a selection of vehicles, they must do
this all the time, whether it be in a radar watch, or at a "sniffing
station," looking for drunken drivers.
In this case, they know that the product comes to the mainland from the
Island. Evidently, it must come across the strait, and ferry travel is much
cheaper, and less scrutinized -- at least hitherto -- than air traffic, and
both air and boat traffic would pose risks that the traffickers would
rather not take.
Hence, it is a reasonable assumption that the ferries are the means. I
suggest that it is, in those terms, the best possible use of rare, and
expensive, police time.
The cars are not moving, no one but those whose cars are shown to be laden
with pot are delayed in their travel, and the police are not rushed into
doing a less than thorough job.
Bravo, say I, and I hope that there are more such searches. If I were
foolish enough to try to move the product -- or even use it (God forbid!)
- -- then I would expect to be caught.
If I am law-abiding (as I am) then I have nothing to fear, as the police
are far too busy with real crimes to manufacture ones.
John A. Laidlaw,
Victoria.
I am afraid I cannot agree that using police dogs to search vehicles on the
ferry for drugs was an unwarranted invasion of our privacy.
If the report be accurate, that warrants were obtained (via Internet, I
assume) on the evidence of odours found by trained dogs, and that only
those cars so identified were searched, then there was nothing done wrong
- -- unless it be that all attempts to stop crimes before they get away are
wrong, and that a police constable can only act, either on the evidence of
his own observations, or on credible sworn complaints from others.
In that the police were targeting a selection of vehicles, they must do
this all the time, whether it be in a radar watch, or at a "sniffing
station," looking for drunken drivers.
In this case, they know that the product comes to the mainland from the
Island. Evidently, it must come across the strait, and ferry travel is much
cheaper, and less scrutinized -- at least hitherto -- than air traffic, and
both air and boat traffic would pose risks that the traffickers would
rather not take.
Hence, it is a reasonable assumption that the ferries are the means. I
suggest that it is, in those terms, the best possible use of rare, and
expensive, police time.
The cars are not moving, no one but those whose cars are shown to be laden
with pot are delayed in their travel, and the police are not rushed into
doing a less than thorough job.
Bravo, say I, and I hope that there are more such searches. If I were
foolish enough to try to move the product -- or even use it (God forbid!)
- -- then I would expect to be caught.
If I am law-abiding (as I am) then I have nothing to fear, as the police
are far too busy with real crimes to manufacture ones.
John A. Laidlaw,
Victoria.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...