LABOUR'S TEN-YEAR DRUGS WAR HAS ACHIEVED NOTHING
BUT LOWER STREET PRICES, SAYS EXPERTS

A decade of Labour's war on drugs has done nothing to curb the
misery and crime caused by abuse, a research group declared yesterday.

Propaganda campaigns, law enforcement and imprisonment for drug
dealers have had no effect on levels of drug use, it said.

Police activity against drug markets and seizures of smuggled drugs
have resulted only in lower street prices.

The scathing criticism came in a report by the UK Drug Policy
Commission, an independently funded group which intends to press the
Government to try harder to tackle huge levels of damage caused by
drug users.

It said that one in four people in their late 20s have tried a hard
drug such as heroin or cocaine at least once; that nearly half of all
young people have used cannabis; and that the drug addiction rate in
Britain is more than twice the levels of France, Germany, Sweden or
Holland.

The report added that there is a drugs market worth an estimated
UKP5billion a year, that the cost of drug-related crime is thought to be
UKP13 billion, and that one in five of all people arrested for crime are
dependent on heroin.

The verdict comes at a time of growing pressure on the Government for
change in the drugs laws that were last radically overhauled more than
35 years ago. Ministers are due to consider the effects of Labour's
ten-year drugs programme - which began bullishly-with the 'war on
drugs' in 1998 - next year.

Tony Blair's war on drugs appeared to be reversed spectacularly in
2001 when then Home Secretary David Blunkett announced the
reclassification of cannabis, a move which downgraded the criminal
status of the drug so that users are unlikely to be arrested.

The chairman of the new Commission, Dame Ruth Runciman, was one of the
key figures behind the cannabis reclassification.

She said yesterday: 'We are an independent organisation that will
provide objective analysis of drug policy. The debate on drugs is
often sensationalised and polarised. Our mission is to improve
political and public understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of
policies for tackling drug misuse.'

Yesterday's report praised 'harm reduction' policies - which broadly
accept the use of drugs and attempt to cut the damage addicts cause -
while dismissing the effects of enforcement law and
imprisonment.

It said: 'Government policies have only limited impact on rates of
drug use itself. However, the UK has introduced evidence-based
measures, notably the expansion of treatment and harm reduction, that
have reduced the harms that would otherwise have occurred.

'On the other hand it operates measures, such as classifying drugs to
deter use and increasing use of imprisonment, that have little or no
support from available research.'

The Commission includes a number of academics and researchers who have
advocated liberalisation of drugs law. Among them are Professor Colin
Blakemore, head of the Medical Research Council, who is a longstanding
advocate of decriminalisation of cannabis, and Roger Howard, former
head of the Drugscope charity and a supporter of softer laws against
all drugs, who is the body's chief executive.

Yesterday's report, An Analysis of UK Drug Policy, was prepared by
academics including Peter Reuter of the University of Maryland, who
has also written in favour of decriminalisation of cannabis.

Tories said the report was 'a shocking indictment of the Government's
failure.'

Shadow Home Secretary David Davies said: 'It shows that Tony Blair has
utterly failed in his pledge to get tough on the 'causes' of crime.
The consequences of this failure are not just that hundreds of
thousands of young lives are being ruined - drugs also fuel much of
the gun and knife related violence on our streets today, thus
destroying communities.'

Anti-drug campaigners were less impressed by the Commission.

Mary Brett of Europe Against Drugs said: 'The members include the
usual suspects who promote decriminalisation.

'The problem is not that people are not aware of the effects of drugs
policy but that they are not aware of the effects of drugs. People
just don't know how dangerous cannabis is.'