HIGH-GRADE POT DOESN'T KILL USERS

Re Joe Hueglin's Sept. 17 letter to the editor titled Many questions need
answers. I think Hueglin is fooling himself by posing questions of
enforcement for marijuana use. What I don't think Mr. Hueglin is
comprehending is that these questions already exist in our society:
questions that the police must currently ignore, since there is no dialogue
concerning how marijuana use may be dealt with (outside of criminal
prosecution). Let's review his comments and consider the relevance:

Will drugs with higher levels of THC be legalized as well? This is similar
to pondering, "Would whisky be legal if beer was?" The higher level of THC
only means that it will take less pot to get you "stoned." This is not
heroin. We do not see pot smokers dropping dead from high-grade marijuana
products. So, yes, hashish and oil will likely be legal (it would be
ridiculous if they weren't).

Will driving be illegal/can it be tested on the spot? Impaired driving is
illegal (including driving tired). But smoking pot makes most people less
likely to even want to drive a car, and marijuana has a strong, sticky
odour, which can be detected. An officer may perform a sobriety test. The
results may then be confirmed through blood tests.

How will they distinguish the age of purchaser? With photo ID. Perhaps a
new form of ID will be created, but surely a passport would suffice.

What taxation will be affixed? As much as the government can get away with.

Dave Almond

Cambridge