News (Media Awareness Project) - US: Wire: Court Backs Docs Who Talk Marijuana |
Title: | US: Wire: Court Backs Docs Who Talk Marijuana |
Published On: | 2002-10-29 |
Source: | Associated Press (Wire) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-21 21:13:54 |
COURT BACKS DOCS WHO TALK MARIJUANA
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A federal appeals court ruled for the first time
Tuesday that the government cannot revoke doctors' prescription licences for
recommending marijuana to sick patients. A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S.
circuit court of appeals unanimously ruled that the Justice Department's
policy interferes with the free-speech rights of doctors and patients.
"An integral component of the practice of medicine is the communication
between doctor and a patient. Physicians must be able to speak frankly and
openly to patients," chief circuit Judge Mary Schroeder said.
The 9th circuit upheld a two-year-old court order prohibiting the government
from stripping doctors of their licences to dispense medication.
The dispute is one of several cases resulting from medical marijuana laws on
the books in eight states.
Federal prosecutors argued that doctors who recommend marijuana are
interfering with the drug war and going against the government's
determination that marijuana has no medical benefits.
Doctors who recommend marijuana in the eight states that have medical
marijuana laws "will make it easier to obtain marijuana in violation of
federal law," government lawyer Michael Stern had said.
Graham Boyd, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer, had urged the judges
to preserve the sanctity of doctor-patient interactions. "That is speech
that is protected by the First Amendment," he argued.
The case was brought by patients' rights groups and doctors including Neil
Flynn of the University of California at Davis, who said that marijuana may
help some patients but that doctors have been fearful of recommending it.
U.S. district Judge William Alsup responded by prohibiting the Justice
Department from revoking Drug Enforcement Administration licences to
dispense medication "merely because the doctor recommends medical marijuana
to a patient based on a sincere medical judgment." Alsup's order also
prevented federal agents "from initiating any investigation solely on that
ground."
The case was an outgrowth of a measure approved by California voters in
1996. It allows patients to use marijuana with a doctor's recommendation.
Following the measure's passage, the Clinton administration said doctors who
recommend marijuana would lose their federal licences to prescribe medicine,
could be excluded from Medicare and Medicaid programs, and could face
criminal charges. The Bush administration continued the fight.
Other states with medical marijuana laws include Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii,
Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.
Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court said clubs that sell marijuana to the sick
with a doctor's recommendation are breaking federal drug laws.
Pot clubs continue to operate, including several in San Francisco, as local
authorities look the other way. But federal officials have raided many clubs
in California, the state where they are more prevalent.
One case challenging such raids is pending before the 9th circuit. That
case, brought by an Oakland pot club, argues that the states have the right
to experiment with their own drug laws and that Americans have a fundamental
right to marijuana as an avenue to be free of pain.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A federal appeals court ruled for the first time
Tuesday that the government cannot revoke doctors' prescription licences for
recommending marijuana to sick patients. A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S.
circuit court of appeals unanimously ruled that the Justice Department's
policy interferes with the free-speech rights of doctors and patients.
"An integral component of the practice of medicine is the communication
between doctor and a patient. Physicians must be able to speak frankly and
openly to patients," chief circuit Judge Mary Schroeder said.
The 9th circuit upheld a two-year-old court order prohibiting the government
from stripping doctors of their licences to dispense medication.
The dispute is one of several cases resulting from medical marijuana laws on
the books in eight states.
Federal prosecutors argued that doctors who recommend marijuana are
interfering with the drug war and going against the government's
determination that marijuana has no medical benefits.
Doctors who recommend marijuana in the eight states that have medical
marijuana laws "will make it easier to obtain marijuana in violation of
federal law," government lawyer Michael Stern had said.
Graham Boyd, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer, had urged the judges
to preserve the sanctity of doctor-patient interactions. "That is speech
that is protected by the First Amendment," he argued.
The case was brought by patients' rights groups and doctors including Neil
Flynn of the University of California at Davis, who said that marijuana may
help some patients but that doctors have been fearful of recommending it.
U.S. district Judge William Alsup responded by prohibiting the Justice
Department from revoking Drug Enforcement Administration licences to
dispense medication "merely because the doctor recommends medical marijuana
to a patient based on a sincere medical judgment." Alsup's order also
prevented federal agents "from initiating any investigation solely on that
ground."
The case was an outgrowth of a measure approved by California voters in
1996. It allows patients to use marijuana with a doctor's recommendation.
Following the measure's passage, the Clinton administration said doctors who
recommend marijuana would lose their federal licences to prescribe medicine,
could be excluded from Medicare and Medicaid programs, and could face
criminal charges. The Bush administration continued the fight.
Other states with medical marijuana laws include Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii,
Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.
Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court said clubs that sell marijuana to the sick
with a doctor's recommendation are breaking federal drug laws.
Pot clubs continue to operate, including several in San Francisco, as local
authorities look the other way. But federal officials have raided many clubs
in California, the state where they are more prevalent.
One case challenging such raids is pending before the 9th circuit. That
case, brought by an Oakland pot club, argues that the states have the right
to experiment with their own drug laws and that Americans have a fundamental
right to marijuana as an avenue to be free of pain.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...