ADDRESS THE CAUSES OF HOMELESSNESS, NOT THE RESULT

Re: Aiding addicts, April 23.

The compassionate editorial recognizes the humanity of our
panhandlers rather than treating them like a species apart. Thank you
for that and for suggesting that we tackle the problem of addiction
rather than targeting the already marginalized.

It seems obvious that none would choose to be an addict or mentally
ill, or under-educated or in whatever condition that results in
someone taking up panhanding. These people are parents, siblings and
children, likely estranged from their families, doing something that
they are aware is desperate and undignified.

They do it covertly, not just to escape the eyes of the law but, to
all appearances, because they are ashamed.

Lest I sound like a softheaded Pollyanna, I do think the money too
often does go directly to the LCBO or to drug dealers; I long ago
stopped doling out cash. However, establishing bylaws or other
practices with the object of getting the panhandlers off the streets
could marginalize them further, even pushing them toward petty crime
and away from downtown where the services they need are located. No
one will benefit.

I live downtown and walk a good deal and have been approached often
by panhandlers, but have not been treated with rudeness even though I
don't give them money. On hot days in the summer, I do give bottled
water if I see someone looking overheated or dehydrated; that
certainly appears to be appreciated.

We should support social services and shelters, as the editorial
suggests, and be thankful that we don't have to avail ourselves of
those services. But if someone wants to hand over change, that's a
personal choice.

Estelle Heron,

Ottawa