News (Media Awareness Project) - US NY: US Marijuana Laws Focus Of NORML Talk |
Title: | US NY: US Marijuana Laws Focus Of NORML Talk |
Published On: | 2002-11-07 |
Source: | Cornell Daily Sun, The (NY) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-21 20:26:12 |
U.S. MARIJUANA LAWS FOCUS OF NORML TALK
Members of both the Cornell and Ithaca communities met last night in the
Appel Commons to discuss current issues surrounding the legalization of
marijuana. The debate was sponsored by Cornell's Community Development and
organized by Michael Barry M.Ed. '02, program director of the Noyes
Community Center.
Keith Stroup, founder and director of the National Organization for the
Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), advocates the decriminalization of
marijuana for multiple reasons. He stated that as long as the recreational
use of the drug was responsible, harmless or medicinal, there was no need
for the government to allocate their already tight funds to "arrest
responsible marijuana smokers who are just average Americans. They work
hard, raise families and contribute to their communities."
Stroup also spoke of the importance of having a legally regulated market
from which individuals could safely buy marijuana, which would thereby get
rid of much of the crime, corruption and violence that many associate with
marijuana use.
Ann Druyan, author, writer and television producer agreed with Stroup on
the benefits of legalizing marijuana and continues to struggle with the
task of bridging the gap between the public's support of its legalization
and with public policy. In order to do this, Druyan encourages "solid
citizens to stand up and say that [public policy] is wrong." Through the
examples of these individuals, she feels that others will be more open with
their lifestyles and that society will see that the use of marijuana does
not have to be viewed as negatively as it has been thus far.
According to the speakers, marijuana is one of the top three recreational
drugs, falling third after alcohol and tobacco, both of which are legal yet
have proven more harmful effects on the body than marijuana.
Globally, the United States stands as one of the few countries that
continues to uphold a strong stance against the legalization of marijuana.
Canada recently legalized the medical use of marijuana and is presently
cultivating their own government crop, so that in the future they can
supply the drug to patients in need, according to the speakers.
Additionally, 17 of the 21 countries in the European Union do not arrest
marijuana users. Although there are several states that have drastically
decreased the penalties for the possession of marijuana, all United States
citizens who use the drug, including those who use it medicinally, risk
being punished by the federal government, as stated by the speakers.
Barry invited many groups with opposing viewpoints to attend the discussion
but they all declined, making the evening extremely one-sided.
The seemingly strong and prevalent feelings of most individuals in
attendance would agree with John Polowczyk '05, who "would like to see
progress made in this area. It's safe if people use it responsibly and it
makes for a good time."
Andrew Bernie '05, believed that as a result of the pro-legalization
beliefs of the vast majority of attendees, it was an evening full of
"preaching about how great pot is instead of having a more dispassionate
analysis."
The anti-legalization side of the debate was not confronted and individuals
with the same sentiments as Bernie felt that the evening could have been
more factual and complete had the other side been addressed.
Members of both the Cornell and Ithaca communities met last night in the
Appel Commons to discuss current issues surrounding the legalization of
marijuana. The debate was sponsored by Cornell's Community Development and
organized by Michael Barry M.Ed. '02, program director of the Noyes
Community Center.
Keith Stroup, founder and director of the National Organization for the
Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), advocates the decriminalization of
marijuana for multiple reasons. He stated that as long as the recreational
use of the drug was responsible, harmless or medicinal, there was no need
for the government to allocate their already tight funds to "arrest
responsible marijuana smokers who are just average Americans. They work
hard, raise families and contribute to their communities."
Stroup also spoke of the importance of having a legally regulated market
from which individuals could safely buy marijuana, which would thereby get
rid of much of the crime, corruption and violence that many associate with
marijuana use.
Ann Druyan, author, writer and television producer agreed with Stroup on
the benefits of legalizing marijuana and continues to struggle with the
task of bridging the gap between the public's support of its legalization
and with public policy. In order to do this, Druyan encourages "solid
citizens to stand up and say that [public policy] is wrong." Through the
examples of these individuals, she feels that others will be more open with
their lifestyles and that society will see that the use of marijuana does
not have to be viewed as negatively as it has been thus far.
According to the speakers, marijuana is one of the top three recreational
drugs, falling third after alcohol and tobacco, both of which are legal yet
have proven more harmful effects on the body than marijuana.
Globally, the United States stands as one of the few countries that
continues to uphold a strong stance against the legalization of marijuana.
Canada recently legalized the medical use of marijuana and is presently
cultivating their own government crop, so that in the future they can
supply the drug to patients in need, according to the speakers.
Additionally, 17 of the 21 countries in the European Union do not arrest
marijuana users. Although there are several states that have drastically
decreased the penalties for the possession of marijuana, all United States
citizens who use the drug, including those who use it medicinally, risk
being punished by the federal government, as stated by the speakers.
Barry invited many groups with opposing viewpoints to attend the discussion
but they all declined, making the evening extremely one-sided.
The seemingly strong and prevalent feelings of most individuals in
attendance would agree with John Polowczyk '05, who "would like to see
progress made in this area. It's safe if people use it responsibly and it
makes for a good time."
Andrew Bernie '05, believed that as a result of the pro-legalization
beliefs of the vast majority of attendees, it was an evening full of
"preaching about how great pot is instead of having a more dispassionate
analysis."
The anti-legalization side of the debate was not confronted and individuals
with the same sentiments as Bernie felt that the evening could have been
more factual and complete had the other side been addressed.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...