REGARDING 'RENOWNED DETECTIVE'

Dear Editor:

(Re Renowned detective addresses perils of crystal meth use, Booster, Nov. 19).

I wonder if Tim Chamberlin and his colleagues thought to ask the "renowned
detective" a few questions like these:

1. Why are you presented the program and not someone who really knows about
drugs, such as a user or physician?

2. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms implies that citizens have the right
to pursue their own form of happiness so long as they harm no one else.
Thus it seems Canadians have the right to ingest any drug, however harmful.
Why do you feel the government has the right to punish individuals for what
they choose to ingest into their own bodies and jail those who supply them?
(By "harm", I don't mean causing anguish to friends and family, otherwise
we would jail all divorcing parents along with any kid who didn't do his or
her homework. I mean direct, physical harm.)

3. If drugs are banned because they are harmful to users, why, then, are
tobacco and alcohol not banned? Doesn't this seem unfair to those who
prefer illegal drugs? If we ban one harmful drug, shouldn't we ban all
harmful drugs?

4. Is it not true that, far from protecting users from harm, banning a drug
harms them much more than would otherwise be the case because it cuts them
off from access to drugs of known potency and purity? Weren't thousands of
Americans poisoned or blinded by adulterated alcohol during Prohibition.
Didn't the problems vanish when alcohol was legalized again?

5. The 1973 Le Dain Commission concluded, "There appears to be little
permanent physiological damage from chronic use of pure opiate narcotics."
Why, then, ban heroin?

6. If prohibition is so great, why did America give up on the prohibition
of alcohol?

7. Is it not true that if drugs and prostitution were legalized, the power
of the Hells Angels would be severely curtailed? After all, Prohibition
created Al Capone, not the other way around.

8. Is it not true that if marijuana were legalized, marijuana grow
operations would be no more dangerous, do no more damage and steal no more
hydro than the average tomato grow operation?

For me, there is no more reason to punish drug users and dealers today than
there was in the past to hang witches, lynch blacks, incarcerate Japanese
Canadians or gas Jews.

Alan Randell

Victoria, BC