News (Media Awareness Project) - UK: Web: New Laws 'Confuse Cannabis Policy' |
Title: | UK: Web: New Laws 'Confuse Cannabis Policy' |
Published On: | 2002-12-01 |
Source: | BBC News (UK Web) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-21 18:22:45 |
NEW LAWS 'CONFUSE CANNABIS POLICY'
The government's policy on cannabis has been condemned as "confused"
because new legislation means possession could lead to arrest.
Under the new Criminal Justice Bill, to be debated by MPs this week, any
individuals caught with any Class C drugs could be arrested.
Home Secretary David Blunkett downgraded cannabis from Class B to C in
order to allow greater focus on Class A drugs such as heroin and cocaine.
That meant it remained illegal, but possession of small amounts would no
longer be considered an arrestable offence.
The Liberal Democrats and a leading drugs charity have reacted with anger
to the new bill, which they say sends out a mixed message.
The Bill also proposes that the maximum penalty for trafficking a Class C
drug will rise from five years' imprisonment to 14 years.
Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Simon Hughes said his party would
challenge the bill.
He said: "Possession of Class C drugs should not be an arrestable offence.
'Muddle'
"The government should be using the bill to send a clear message that the
punishment will fit the severity of the offence and the class of drug involved.
"Ministers are in danger of creating a muddle."
Roger Howard, chief executive for the drugs charity DrugScope, said: "This
about-face makes a mockery of reclassification.
"Instead of focusing on Class A drugs, saving police time and producing a
more logical drugs policy, the small print of this bill means that the law
will be more severe and more confused than ever."
In the majority of cases, however, officers will issue a warning and seize
the drugs
Home Office Labour MP for Cardiff Central Jon Owen Jones, who last year
tabled a bill to legalise cannabis, said: "It is a very regrettable and
difficult to understand decision.
"The government seems to have one foot forward and another foot back."
Home Office notes explaining the provisions of the bill read: "This change
in the law would mean that police would retain their power of arrest for
possession of cannabis after the proposed reclassification of the drug from
Class B to Class C."
A Home Office spokeswoman denied there was any confusion.
She said the Association of Chief Police Officers would be bringing out a
guide on the new laws, adding: "It is critical that the police retain the
power of arrest to deal with cannabis possession linked to aggravated
behaviour that threatens public disorder.
"In the majority of cases, however, officers will issue a warning and seize
the drugs."
The government's policy on cannabis has been condemned as "confused"
because new legislation means possession could lead to arrest.
Under the new Criminal Justice Bill, to be debated by MPs this week, any
individuals caught with any Class C drugs could be arrested.
Home Secretary David Blunkett downgraded cannabis from Class B to C in
order to allow greater focus on Class A drugs such as heroin and cocaine.
That meant it remained illegal, but possession of small amounts would no
longer be considered an arrestable offence.
The Liberal Democrats and a leading drugs charity have reacted with anger
to the new bill, which they say sends out a mixed message.
The Bill also proposes that the maximum penalty for trafficking a Class C
drug will rise from five years' imprisonment to 14 years.
Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Simon Hughes said his party would
challenge the bill.
He said: "Possession of Class C drugs should not be an arrestable offence.
'Muddle'
"The government should be using the bill to send a clear message that the
punishment will fit the severity of the offence and the class of drug involved.
"Ministers are in danger of creating a muddle."
Roger Howard, chief executive for the drugs charity DrugScope, said: "This
about-face makes a mockery of reclassification.
"Instead of focusing on Class A drugs, saving police time and producing a
more logical drugs policy, the small print of this bill means that the law
will be more severe and more confused than ever."
In the majority of cases, however, officers will issue a warning and seize
the drugs
Home Office Labour MP for Cardiff Central Jon Owen Jones, who last year
tabled a bill to legalise cannabis, said: "It is a very regrettable and
difficult to understand decision.
"The government seems to have one foot forward and another foot back."
Home Office notes explaining the provisions of the bill read: "This change
in the law would mean that police would retain their power of arrest for
possession of cannabis after the proposed reclassification of the drug from
Class B to Class C."
A Home Office spokeswoman denied there was any confusion.
She said the Association of Chief Police Officers would be bringing out a
guide on the new laws, adding: "It is critical that the police retain the
power of arrest to deal with cannabis possession linked to aggravated
behaviour that threatens public disorder.
"In the majority of cases, however, officers will issue a warning and seize
the drugs."
Member Comments |
No member comments available...