CHIEF WANTS NEW PROBE OF RAMPART

Bratton asks for an outside panel to review how the LAPD handled the
scandal, fearing it could 'bleed this department to death.'

Los Angeles Police Chief William J. Bratton called Tuesday for an
independent "blue ribbon committee" to account for the LAPD's handling of
the Rampart corruption scandal, saying that efforts to do so by department
officials have been "totally inadequate."

In calling for the formation of the panel, Bratton told members of the
city's civilian Police Commission that the Rampart scandal still hangs over
the Los Angeles Police Department and that if it isn't addressed, it has
the potential to "bleed this department to death."

"Let's take ownership of this issue," Bratton told commissioners during
their regular weekly meeting on the first floor of police headquarters.
"Let's get it out of the way."

Police Commission President Rick Caruso immediately embraced Bratton's
proposal.

"Let's just do it on our own," Caruso told fellow commissioners. "We're the
head of this department. Let's act like the head of this department."

The scandal broke in September 1999, after ex-officer Rafael Perez told
authorities as part of a plea deal that he and other anti-gang and
narcotics officers in the Rampart Division routinely planted evidence,
framed suspects and covered up unjustified shootings.

Shortly after, then-Chief Bernard C. Parks promised a report that would
document "the exact nature and disposition of each allegation" that
surfaced in the corruption probe.

This so-called after-action report was to be a companion piece to the
department's Board of Inquiry report, which addressed the administrative
and managerial failures that police officials believed contributed to
misconduct in Rampart.

Parks initially said the after-action report would be presented to the
public by early 2001. But as the investigation continued, the chief and
other department officials stopped talking publicly about the report. In
fact, members of the Los Angeles Police Commission and the LAPD's inspector
general had forgotten that such a report was promised until The Times
disclosed last year that its release was long overdue.

Since then, nearly weekly, Caruso has been asking the department to produce
the report.

"It's criminal that in the past this board ... has been asking for a report
and we haven't been able to get one," Caruso said Tuesday.

Bratton said that, in its current form, the report is actually several
separate draft documents, "none of which I would describe as complete or
useful."

The chief said he was proposing an outside review because the public "will
not trust anything coming from the department as it relates to Rampart."

"I've been to too many community meetings where Rampart keeps coming up
again and again and again," said Bratton, who inherited the scandal when he
took over the department in October.

To date, Perez and eight other Rampart Division anti-gang unit officers
have been criminally charged. Of those eight, four pleaded guilty or no
contest to charges and three others were convicted by a jury. Those
convictions were overturned by a Superior Court judge and county
prosecutors have appealed that decision. One officer was acquitted of charges.

Perez and his former partner Nino Durden are serving federal prison
sentences in connection with the shooting of an unarmed gang member. Three
others await sentencing.

In November, Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley announced that more than 80
Rampart-related cases involving criminal allegations against police
officers would not result in prosecutions. Cooley's spokeswoman, Sandi
Gibbons, declined comment Tuesday on whether Bratton's lack of confidence
in the LAPD's accounting of the scandal would have any impact on
prosecutors' assessment of what occurred in Rampart .

"I don't think it would be appropriate to comment on what is an internal
matter for the LAPD," Gibbons said.

At the LAPD, top officials have been scrambling to account for the
department's investigative efforts in Rampart, which critics have described
as lacking. Some department observers have accused the LAPD of covering up
and minimizing the true extent of officer misconduct.

Several months ago, then-Assistant Chief David Gascon, a top aide to Parks,
acknowledged that at least three shootings that Perez alleged were covered
up had not been thoroughly investigated by the LAPD's corruption task force.

Cmdr. Daniel Koenig, who had been assigned to write the after-action
report, has been warning commissioners for months that he faced a
monumental task. He has acknowledged that the internal reports he has
received were far from comprehensive accounts of the investigative efforts.

In addition, he said some of the internal reports he received from LAPD
officials were more focused on assigning blame for problems during the
investigation than on detailing what had been done.

On Tuesday, Koenig said he was not opposed to having a group of outsiders
try to complete the report.

"If that's what it's going to take, then that's fine," Koenig said. "We
need to move on and get some closure."

Ramona Ripston, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union in
Los Angeles , praised Bratton's proposal, saying it reflected "a strong
commitment to reform."

"This issue is too important to be swept under the rug," Ripston said,
adding that "the department's credibility and prospects for regaining the
community's trust" are at stake.

Historically, the LAPD has written after-action reports following serious
episodes. In recent years, for instance, such reports were produced after
the 2000 Democratic National Convention and after the 1997 North Hollywood
shootout with two heavily armed bank robbers.

One widely publicized after-action report followed an investigation into
the taped allegations of former Det. Mark Fuhrman, who told an aspiring
screenwriter tales of police brutality and discrimination. The tapes
surfaced during the O.J. Simpson murder trial.

Joe Gunn, executive director of the Police Commission, said the commission
is expected to discuss the panel's makeup at its meeting in two weeks.

"They will want to get someone from the outside -- probably community
leaders who are well respected," Gunn said.

If the report was to come from within the Police Department, he added,
"There's always the accusation that we are white-washing it."