News (Media Awareness Project) - US MO: Law Enforcement Agencies Seize $5 Million In Assets |
Title: | US MO: Law Enforcement Agencies Seize $5 Million In Assets |
Published On: | 2003-03-06 |
Source: | The Southeast Missourian (MO) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-20 22:48:02 |
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES SEIZE $5 MILLION IN ASSETS
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- Law enforcement agencies seized nearly $5.1 million
in assets believed to have resulted from criminal activity last year -- a
40 percent increase from 2001, according to a new state audit. The audit
examines the actions taken by law enforcement under the state's Criminal
Activity Forfeiture Act in 2002.
Changes to the CAFA statute made two years ago require county prosecuting
attorneys and the state attorney general to annually report seizures made
in their jurisdictions to the state auditor. The revised law was intended
to better track proceeds from seizures and stem perceived abuses of the
system by some law enforcement agencies.
The impetus for the change was to close a legal loophole some agencies had
used to circumvent the Missouri Constitution's requirement that seized
assets be placed in a state fund for education.
Some local agencies that discovered ill-gotten assets would involve federal
agents, usually from the Drug Enforcement Administration, in the seizure
after the fact. After taking a cut of the proceeds, the federal agency
would return the rest to the local department for its own use. The new law
clarified that assets seized by Missouri law enforcement can only be turned
over to the federal government if the property is taken as part of a joint
local-federal operation.
However, substantially more money was turned over to federal agencies in
2002 than in the prior year.
In 2001, $500,000 -- or 14 percent of the total amount seized -- was
transferred to the federal government while $226,000 -- 6 percent -- was
turned over to the state.
In 2002, $1.3 million -- 26 percent of the total -- went to a federal
agency and $231,000 -- 5 percent -- to the state.
Legitimate Operations
State Auditor Claire McCaskill said some of the transferred assets no doubt
resulted from legitimate joint operations. She said the data prosecutors
are required to submit is insufficient for auditors to determine whether
any local agencies are still skirting the constitution.
About 20 percent, or $1 million, of the $5.1 million worth of cash or
property seized last year was returned to its owners. The disposition of
the remaining $2.5 million was still pending or otherwise unknown.
Reporting compliance improved from 90 percent last year to 95 percent this
year. Of the 115 local prosecutors that must report plus the attorney
general, McCaskill's office received responses from all but six --
including three from Southeast Missouri.
Cape Girardeau County Prosecuting Attorney Morley Swingle said his failure
to turn in the county's information was an oversight. He said there were
only a handful of seizure cases in the county last year.
[SIDEBAR]
Disposition Of Assets
Disposition of law enforcement seizures reported for 2002 under the
Criminal Assets Forfeiture Act by Southeast Missouri county prosecuting
attorneys. Prosecuting attorneys in Bollinger, Carter, Iron, Madison,
Perry, Ripley and Stoddard counties reported they had no seizure cases
during 2001.
COUNTY CASES TOTAL VALUE
Butler 4 $11,334
Cape Girardeau Did Not Report
Dunklin 1 $4,500
Mississippi 1 $5,069
New Madrid 7 $149,102
Pemiscot 1 $2,700
Reynolds Did Not Report
Scott 4 $32,166
St. Francois 4 $5,437
Ste. Genevieve 4 $3,871
Wayne Did Not Report
SOURCE: Missouri State Auditor
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- Law enforcement agencies seized nearly $5.1 million
in assets believed to have resulted from criminal activity last year -- a
40 percent increase from 2001, according to a new state audit. The audit
examines the actions taken by law enforcement under the state's Criminal
Activity Forfeiture Act in 2002.
Changes to the CAFA statute made two years ago require county prosecuting
attorneys and the state attorney general to annually report seizures made
in their jurisdictions to the state auditor. The revised law was intended
to better track proceeds from seizures and stem perceived abuses of the
system by some law enforcement agencies.
The impetus for the change was to close a legal loophole some agencies had
used to circumvent the Missouri Constitution's requirement that seized
assets be placed in a state fund for education.
Some local agencies that discovered ill-gotten assets would involve federal
agents, usually from the Drug Enforcement Administration, in the seizure
after the fact. After taking a cut of the proceeds, the federal agency
would return the rest to the local department for its own use. The new law
clarified that assets seized by Missouri law enforcement can only be turned
over to the federal government if the property is taken as part of a joint
local-federal operation.
However, substantially more money was turned over to federal agencies in
2002 than in the prior year.
In 2001, $500,000 -- or 14 percent of the total amount seized -- was
transferred to the federal government while $226,000 -- 6 percent -- was
turned over to the state.
In 2002, $1.3 million -- 26 percent of the total -- went to a federal
agency and $231,000 -- 5 percent -- to the state.
Legitimate Operations
State Auditor Claire McCaskill said some of the transferred assets no doubt
resulted from legitimate joint operations. She said the data prosecutors
are required to submit is insufficient for auditors to determine whether
any local agencies are still skirting the constitution.
About 20 percent, or $1 million, of the $5.1 million worth of cash or
property seized last year was returned to its owners. The disposition of
the remaining $2.5 million was still pending or otherwise unknown.
Reporting compliance improved from 90 percent last year to 95 percent this
year. Of the 115 local prosecutors that must report plus the attorney
general, McCaskill's office received responses from all but six --
including three from Southeast Missouri.
Cape Girardeau County Prosecuting Attorney Morley Swingle said his failure
to turn in the county's information was an oversight. He said there were
only a handful of seizure cases in the county last year.
[SIDEBAR]
Disposition Of Assets
Disposition of law enforcement seizures reported for 2002 under the
Criminal Assets Forfeiture Act by Southeast Missouri county prosecuting
attorneys. Prosecuting attorneys in Bollinger, Carter, Iron, Madison,
Perry, Ripley and Stoddard counties reported they had no seizure cases
during 2001.
COUNTY CASES TOTAL VALUE
Butler 4 $11,334
Cape Girardeau Did Not Report
Dunklin 1 $4,500
Mississippi 1 $5,069
New Madrid 7 $149,102
Pemiscot 1 $2,700
Reynolds Did Not Report
Scott 4 $32,166
St. Francois 4 $5,437
Ste. Genevieve 4 $3,871
Wayne Did Not Report
SOURCE: Missouri State Auditor
Member Comments |
No member comments available...