LEGISLATION TO MOVE ANTI-MEDICINAL POT FUNDS TURNED BACK

A House bill that would provide public funding for ad campaigns to fight
medicinal-marijuana initiatives has been turned back because of language
that could allow ads to become partisan attacks.

The Republican-sponsored legislation would also allow the movement of
drug-enforcement money intended to fight the prevalence of drugs at the
state and local level to the coffers of federal agents so they could better
police the use of medicinal marijuana.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Mark Souder, Indiana Republican, would repeal a
law that bars White House drug-policy director John Walters from using
public funds for "partisan political purposes."

But Mr. Walters never requested the money, said Tom Riley, his spokesman.

"I think both of these provisions spring from the same source, and that is
that many in Congress think that marijuana is not taken seriously enough,"
Mr. Riley said. "The fact is that we have never used ads for partisan
purposes that we can already use state and local money if we need it."

The idea behind the provision, though, was merely an attempt to ensure that
funding in place for the White House drug office was properly spent, said a
spokesman for the House Government Reform Committee, where the bill landed.

"It was to make sure we have tighter control on whatever spending is done,"
said spokesman Dave Marin. "The money is not for briefing Hollywood
scriptwriters on drug policy or for pencils for drug-free schools, as it
has been used in the past."

Another portion of the bill would permit shifting a portion of $230 million
in federal taxpayer money allocated to local jurisdictions in key regions
back to federal coffers "to assist in enforcement of federal law ... where
state law permits the use of marijuana in a manner inconsistent with the
Controlled Substances Act," according to the bill.

Marijuana-legalization advocates see the provision that allows the federal
government to take state and local money as an effort to punish states that
pass medical-marijuana laws.

"What that means is that they can take [money] from these states fighting
heroin and methamphetamine and give it to the feds to combat cannabis clubs
that are helping sick people," said Steve Fox, legislative director with
the Marijuana Policy Project. "They are saying that if state authorities
aren't going after medical-marijuana patients, they will lose some of their
money."

Voters in seven states -- Alaska, Washington, Oregon, California, Colorado,
Nevada and Maine -- have passed referendums allowing the use of marijuana
to help ill patients cope with the debilitating effects of cancer
treatment, as well as to ease the pain of several other maladies, including
multiple sclerosis and AIDS.

Two other state legislatures, in Hawaii and Maryland, have passed laws
allowing marijuana to be used as a form of medical treatment. Marijuana
opponents say voters and lawmakers in the states have been misled by
pro-pot groups and that there is no medical use for smoking marijuana.

Federal law-enforcement agents, though, have overridden voters' wishes in
several states and arrested people who sell the disputed medicine under
federal laws, which trump state statutes. Marijuana, according to federal
law, is as dangerous and destructive as heroin.