News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Edu: Local Speakers Inform Students About Drug |
Title: | US CA: Edu: Local Speakers Inform Students About Drug |
Published On: | 2003-06-02 |
Source: | New University (CA Edu) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-20 05:07:31 |
LOCAL SPEAKERS INFORM STUDENTS ABOUT DRUG LEGALIZATION
ASUCI hosted an unprecedented debate regarding the legalization of
marijuana held in Humanities Instructional Building 100 on May 28.
More than 200 people showed up to get the highs and lows on marijuana
from two local speakers. Judge James Gray, a superior court judge in
Orange County, strongly condemned current drug policies, while Dr.
Michael Stone, addiction medicine specialist, focused on the
physiological ramifications of smoking marijuana.
Marcy Lopez and Carmen Reynaga, co-commissioners of campus affairs
programming for ASUCI, were moderators of the event.
"A majority of UCI students either use marijuana or are at least
interested in the issue [of legalizing marijuana]," Reynaga said.
Highly critical of the current drug policies in the United States,
Gray feels that just because drugs like marijuana are illegal does not
mean they are unavailable.
"Marijuana is the largest cash crop in the United States today; number
two is corn," Gray said. "We couldn't make marijuana more available
than we are today--and so the question is should we moralize about
[marijuana use] or should we try to manage [it]?"
Gray's ideas on decriminalizing marijuana include making it and other
drugs like heroine and cocaine available to adults 21 and over who are
determined to obtain it.
Gray also argued that the rampant incarceration of people is not only
overcrowding our prisons but taking money away from the prosecution of
more dangerous crimes.
"We need to redistribute our resources and stop making people
automatic criminals. We ought to get them help from professionals,"
Gray said.
Gray spotlighted alcohol as a more dangerous yet legal and regulated
drug.
"In my view, marijuana is a far less dangerous drug than alcohol,"
Gray said. "The drug that is most equated with violence is alcohol,
far and away."
Following Gray's arguments, Stone opened with a more biological
approach to marijuana use. He discussed the differences between
addiction and dependency and pointed out that young people have a
higher propensity to become dependent on marijuana.
"Dependency refers to the physical component where your body needs the
drug, but addiction is a combination of physical and psychological
components--more of a compulsion," Stone said.
Stone continued by discussing the effects of marijuana.
"The biggest thing that marijuana does to those who smoke it is that
it takes away classical boredom. It changes the novelty factor, making
things more novel than they are," Stone said
Stone agreed with Gray's statement that marijuana users need to seek
professional help rather than be placed in prisons or jails.
"I don't think everyone who smokes marijuana should be in prison,"
Stone said. "We should be treating addicts, not putting them in jail."
As a conclusion to the debate, both Gray and Stone seemed to agree on
several issues which left some students feeling a bit unsatisfied.
"I thought the debate was really one-sided," said first-year biology
major Salma Khoshfekr. "I didn't expect to come here and watch both of
them agree on so much."
Still, some who felt indifferent about the subject left the lecture
with a more solid opinion on the issue.
"After hearing what Judge Gray had to say I pretty much agree with the
points he made," said first-year criminology major Daniel
Berkenkotter. "Legalizing [marijuana] so we can control it is a much
better idea and I think that's what we need to do."
Second-year criminology graduate student Johnny Nhan supported the
idea of changing the current laws as well.
"I'm not for full legalization, but I'm for the reduction of
penalties, Nhan said. "I'd like to see more lenient sentencing and
fines."
Second-year film studies and political science major Adam Boothby
opposes legalization of marijuana.
"I don't think it should be made legal because of the overuse of it
right now," Boothby said. "By making marijuana legal we would only
exponentially increase its use. We see how many people are using it
now, so if we make it legal, the sky's the limit."
ASUCI hosted an unprecedented debate regarding the legalization of
marijuana held in Humanities Instructional Building 100 on May 28.
More than 200 people showed up to get the highs and lows on marijuana
from two local speakers. Judge James Gray, a superior court judge in
Orange County, strongly condemned current drug policies, while Dr.
Michael Stone, addiction medicine specialist, focused on the
physiological ramifications of smoking marijuana.
Marcy Lopez and Carmen Reynaga, co-commissioners of campus affairs
programming for ASUCI, were moderators of the event.
"A majority of UCI students either use marijuana or are at least
interested in the issue [of legalizing marijuana]," Reynaga said.
Highly critical of the current drug policies in the United States,
Gray feels that just because drugs like marijuana are illegal does not
mean they are unavailable.
"Marijuana is the largest cash crop in the United States today; number
two is corn," Gray said. "We couldn't make marijuana more available
than we are today--and so the question is should we moralize about
[marijuana use] or should we try to manage [it]?"
Gray's ideas on decriminalizing marijuana include making it and other
drugs like heroine and cocaine available to adults 21 and over who are
determined to obtain it.
Gray also argued that the rampant incarceration of people is not only
overcrowding our prisons but taking money away from the prosecution of
more dangerous crimes.
"We need to redistribute our resources and stop making people
automatic criminals. We ought to get them help from professionals,"
Gray said.
Gray spotlighted alcohol as a more dangerous yet legal and regulated
drug.
"In my view, marijuana is a far less dangerous drug than alcohol,"
Gray said. "The drug that is most equated with violence is alcohol,
far and away."
Following Gray's arguments, Stone opened with a more biological
approach to marijuana use. He discussed the differences between
addiction and dependency and pointed out that young people have a
higher propensity to become dependent on marijuana.
"Dependency refers to the physical component where your body needs the
drug, but addiction is a combination of physical and psychological
components--more of a compulsion," Stone said.
Stone continued by discussing the effects of marijuana.
"The biggest thing that marijuana does to those who smoke it is that
it takes away classical boredom. It changes the novelty factor, making
things more novel than they are," Stone said
Stone agreed with Gray's statement that marijuana users need to seek
professional help rather than be placed in prisons or jails.
"I don't think everyone who smokes marijuana should be in prison,"
Stone said. "We should be treating addicts, not putting them in jail."
As a conclusion to the debate, both Gray and Stone seemed to agree on
several issues which left some students feeling a bit unsatisfied.
"I thought the debate was really one-sided," said first-year biology
major Salma Khoshfekr. "I didn't expect to come here and watch both of
them agree on so much."
Still, some who felt indifferent about the subject left the lecture
with a more solid opinion on the issue.
"After hearing what Judge Gray had to say I pretty much agree with the
points he made," said first-year criminology major Daniel
Berkenkotter. "Legalizing [marijuana] so we can control it is a much
better idea and I think that's what we need to do."
Second-year criminology graduate student Johnny Nhan supported the
idea of changing the current laws as well.
"I'm not for full legalization, but I'm for the reduction of
penalties, Nhan said. "I'd like to see more lenient sentencing and
fines."
Second-year film studies and political science major Adam Boothby
opposes legalization of marijuana.
"I don't think it should be made legal because of the overuse of it
right now," Boothby said. "By making marijuana legal we would only
exponentially increase its use. We see how many people are using it
now, so if we make it legal, the sky's the limit."
Member Comments |
No member comments available...