Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: Judge Nixes Cops For Hydro Inspections
Title:CN BC: Judge Nixes Cops For Hydro Inspections
Published On:2007-06-08
Source:Now, The (Surrey, CN BC)
Fetched On:2008-01-12 04:27:43
JUDGE NIXES COPS FOR HYDRO INSPECTIONS

The City of Surrey will look into hiring private security guards to
protect firefighters and BC Hydro personnel during residential checks
for marijuana grow-ops, rather than using RCMP escorts.

That's in response to a B.C. Supreme Court judge's order Tuesday
requiring B.C. Hydro to reconnect the power to a South Surrey home -
which authorities decided to inspect after noticing high electricity
consumption at the residence - because police had escorted
firefighters and an electrical inspector onto the property.

"I guess the ruling was that for the police to go on the property,
they needed a warrant and for them to be on the property without a
warrant, it was an illegal search," noted John Sherstone, manager of
Surrey's bylaws and licensing services.

"It was a challenge on the City of Surrey's electrical disconnect."

Surrey Fire Chief Len Garis said Surrey's Electrical Fire Safety
Initiative (EFSI) team, comprised of firefighters, police and
electrical inspectors, has completed more than 500 household
inspections since March 2005, finding 88 per cent of those houses
inspected required major electrical repairs.

EFSI's mandate is to reduce fires and other safety hazards caused by
marijuana grow-ops, which typically draw serious electricity and have
dangerous wiring schemes.

Despite Tuesday's ruling, Garis sees no setback to the program.

Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts is considering creative alternatives.

"We only use police for safety issues," she said. "If they don't like
the fact that it's the police that are working with our firefighters,
then that's fine; we'll have somebody else.

"But at the end of the day we want to make sure our firefighters are
protected and are safe and that whole team of B.C. Hydro personnel as
well, their safety is first and foremost. That's the reason why we
had the police there, and the only reason. The police aren't there to
lay charges; the police aren't there to execute warrants. We're there
because it's a fire safety issue."

If not the police, then who else? "I don't know," Watts replied.
"Maybe we need to have a look at private security, I'm not sure.
That's something we're going to have a look into."

As for the possibility of not having police escorts during
inspections, Garis said, "We're going to have to wrestle with that notion."

Meantime, it remains to be seen whether city hall will challenge the
judge's ruling.

"I don't think that decision's been made yet," Dave Bennett, Surrey's
assistant city solicitor, said at press time.
Member Comments
No member comments available...