Prescription Pot

DRIVE UNDER WAY TO MAKE MEDICAL MARIJUANA LEGAL IN MICHIGAN

Rochelle Lampkin knows she's breaking the law when she lights a joint
and takes a few tokes, but she doesn't feel like a criminal.

"Sometimes," she says, "you have to do something that's wrong for all
the right reasons."

The 48-year-old Detroit grandmother has multiple sclerosis, and an
associated condition called optic neuritis, an excruciatingly painful
inflammation of the optic nerve. It hits her a few times a month.

"It's like an explosion," says Lampkin. "On a scale of 1 to 10, I'd
say it's a 12."

She tried prescription pain relievers, but was bothered by the side
effects. Vicodin, a narcotic related to opium, made her nauseous and
sleepy. Tylenol 4, which contains the opiate codeine, had a similar
effect. "They were just too strong for me," says Lampkin.

Then some people in the MS support groups she belongs to started
suggesting she try pot to ease the pain. One of the frequently cited
medical benefits attributed to marijuana is its effectiveness at
easing the spasms that often afflict people who suffer from MS.
Although spasms weren't a major problem for Lampkin, some thought it
could help deal with the eye pain as well. But Lampkin was reluctant.
Neither a drinker nor a smoker, she recoiled at the thought of doing
an illegal drug.

"I was afraid of it," recalls Lampkin. But finally, out of
desperation, she got a "marijuana cigarette" from a friend she knew
would be "discreet and wouldn't lace it with anything" and fired up.
It took just a few "puffs" for the pain to ease.

"It worked," she says.

Now she's backing a push to make it legal for Michigan doctors to
prescribe marijuana to patients like herself.

The drive to place the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act on the 2008
ballot began last month. Dianne Byrum, a former state legislator
whose PR firm is working with the Ferndale-based Michigan Coalition
for Compassionate Care, says organizers have six months to collect
304,101 valid petition signatures to get the measure on the ballot;
the goal is to collect 550,000 signatures to ensure enough are valid.
Both volunteers and paid signature-gatherers will be used, says Byrum.

If approved by voters, the measure would allow patients with a
doctor's prescription or their caregivers to grow up to 12 plants.
They would need to register with the state Department of Community
Health and receive a state-issued ID card.

Twelve states have legalized the use of marijuana to ease the
suffering of people afflicted with AIDS, cancer, multiple sclerosis,
glaucoma and other serious ailments. Only once, in South Dakota, have
voters turned down a statewide medical marijuana measure once it got
on the ballot.

Even in the eyes of proponents, these measures are not without their
flaws. With the exception of California's, the laws don't allow for
the establishment of distribution systems. Ideally, patients would be
able to go to a pharmacy to get prescriptions filled, just as they
would any other medicine. But because federal law prohibits that,
anyone supplying marijuana to a patient, no matter what the state law
is, is open to prosecution by federal authorities. Likewise, federal
agents can still arrest patients using marijuana as medicine, even if
state law allows it.

For critics, the fact that these laws are on the books at all is the
real problem.

In 2005, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided that state laws did not
protect medical marijuana users from federal prosecution, John P.
Walters, director of the White House Office of National Drug Control
Policy, hailed the ruling, saying: "There isn't medical crack, there
isn't medical meth, there isn't medical heroin, there isn't medical marijuana."

"I'm sorry, that's just crazy, but that's the level of absurdity this
discussion reaches," says Bruce Mirken, communications director for
the Marijuana Policy Project, a nonprofit advocacy group.

For starters, a number of established medical groups have endorsed
the use of medicinal marijuana. Organizations including the American
Academy of Family Physicians, American Nurses Association, American
Public Health Association and the American Academy of HIV Medicine
have come out in support of some form of physician-assisted access to pot.

Former U.S. Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders wrote in a newspaper
opinion piece that the "evidence is overwhelming that marijuana can
relieve certain types of pain, nausea, vomiting and other symptoms
caused by such illnesses as multiple sclerosis, cancer and AIDS -- or
by the harsh drugs sometimes used to treat them. And it can do so
with remarkable safety. Indeed, marijuana is less toxic than many of
the drugs used today."

But acceptance by the medical establishment is far from universal.
Neither the American Medical Association nor the Michigan State
Medical Society endorses the use of medical marijuana; they and
others contend more research is needed.

Some of the past objections are falling by the wayside, however. The
criticism that it makes no sense to deliver a medicine that contains
all the harmful effects of smoke is neutered by the development of
vaporizers that allow marijuana to be inhaled in a smokeless form.

But, paradoxically, such "paraphernalia" is generally illegal,
driving up their cost and making them inaccessible to people like
Lampkin, who would like to be able to use such a device.

"The smoke is like taking nasty medicine, when I was a kid," says
Lampkin. "It's not fun, but I do it because it works."

She's not claiming it's a prescription for everyone's ills. What she
is saying that there are people for whom it is effective, and
preferable to the other options. There might be people who will abuse
it -- but that's not a reason to prohibit its use. After all, look at
the number of people abusing Vicodin and other prescription drugs.

In Michigan, proponents of medical marijuana have reason to be
optimistic. Since 2004, voters in five cities -- Detroit, Ann Arbor,
Traverse City, Ferndale and Flint -- have passed ordinances that
direct local police to let medical marijuana users puff in peace. In
each case, voters approved the measures by large margins.

Rochelle Lampkin, who spoke out in favor of the Detroit measure, is
doing so again in support of the statewide initiative. But she's
urging voters to research the issue and decide for themselves what's
right. In researching this article, the Metro Times found a good site
for exploring both sides of the issue on the Web at medicalmarijuanaprocon.org

For the people like Lampkin who've found pot to be an effective
medicine that relieves their suffering, this comes down to a personal decision.

"I know what I'm doing is against the law," she says. "But I've come
to terms with that. I hope it's made legal."

Either way though, she has what she considers a legitimate reason for
continuing to use it.

"I'm a grown woman," she says. "Why would you tell me I can't do
something that helps me? That's sick."