DRUGS 101

For Today's Teens, 'Just Say No' Doesn't Cut It

Techno dance music thumps, a rhythm that churns the blood and gnaws the
bones. Arms pump the air while naked torsos bump and slide against each
other. One dancer, with a grey-grizzled face, is a bouncing parody of
dungeon S & M, distended porcine belly and chest lashed with metal-studded
black leather straps.

The other dancers, mostly male, are tautly muscled, with beautiful faces.

They are Asian, white, and black.

Some are as young as 15; most are in their early 20s.

Those on ecstasy, or MDMA, have large, dilated pupils, red faces, and are
sweating profusely.

They are happy and genial and touch others as they speak.
Crystal-methamphetamine users have darting eyes and a manic, paranoid look.
Intense conversations flit about in annoying non sequiturs.

Those on GHB seem drunk and will suddenly cease dancing, like puppets
abandoned by their puppeteers. Ketamine users sit, dull-eyed and torpid, in
the smoking room at the back of the club or on stools along the walls,
watching the dancers.

This is The World, a legal, after-hours, no-booze club that draws hundreds
of Vancouver party people nightly to dance until 8 a.m. in an undeveloped
basement on Granville Street. In one sense, it is also a microcosm of the
real world.

This world includes teens who don't frequent Vancouver's West End party and
club scene but who will smoke or snort cheap crystal meth, also known as
speed, behind their school or in a Kerrisdale back alley on the way home.
It exists at private parties in the Fraser Valley and in bars, raves, and
dance clubs all over the Lower Mainland.

Obviously, teenagers and young adults know how to obtain these
pharmaceuticals. (Surveys show that underage youths can buy drugs easier
than liquor.) What is less obvious is whether or not users are fully aware
of the physical and psychological effects of drug use. Education about
illicit drugs is part of the career and personal planning (CAPP) program
for grades 8 to 12 students in B.C. However, drug education is not
mandatory and is offered in snippets, and inconsistently, from school to
school.

The message, when taught, is two-pronged and based upon the ideal of a
drug-free society, which is trotted out in North American schools through
the police-taught and supported DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education)
program. This program emphasizes that drug users and sellers risk
incarceration, and that there are dire physiological effects of misuse,
from a wasted youth to overdosing and even death.

But years of studies show that the threat of prison or ill health isn't
taken seriously by teens, certainly not by those who are already
experimenting with cigarettes, alcohol, pot, and the so-called designer and
club drugs that were spawned by the rave culture.

These teens are listening politely to the police message and shrugging it
off. Instead of relying upon such "experts", kids turn to each other for
drug edification.

That's worrisome enough to have inspired some new ideas about drug
education that are creative, and even radical, in comparison to the
traditional, moralistic "Just say 'no' to drugs" model coined by former
United States president Ronald Reagan in the '80s.

DESIGNER DRUGS ARE amphetamine-type stimulants; ecstasy, for example,
floods the brain with serotonin, creating a sense of euphoria.

Both ecstasy and crystal meth are produced, increasingly, in clandestine
home laboratories. Club drugs include the depressants GHB, ketamine, and
Rohypnol, a sleep-disorder medication that induces a high when consumed
with alcohol. According to Cpl. Scott Rintoul, the RCMP drug-awareness
coordinator in B.C., the trend toward a rave culture of chemical-drug use
is due, in part, to the success of coordinated international efforts to
quash the export of heroin and cocaine out of Asia and Latin America.

Police worry most about methamphetamine, or crystal meth, because of the
ease of making it, its addictive properties, and its multihour high. (See
the Straight's "The Dark Crystal", August 14-21.) Ecstasy is a more
elaborate concoction but is also part of the growing dope cottage industry,
Rintoul says.

In a world where party drugs are locally made and easily obtained, the
"Just say 'no' " mantra has taken a hit. A multitude of studies shows that
teens have not pledged an oath of allegiance to this paternalistic caveat.

The feeling is that drugs are liberating; it is a freeborn right to
expropriate the experience of intoxication. Those who go to a summer rave
and pop a pill of ecstasy would undoubtedly scoff at the idea that this is
the first step to becoming one of the Downtown Eastside's heroin and crack
addicts.

Brade Stanton, a tall, blond, spiky-haired regular--and regular drug
user--at The World says: "Scare tactics don't work with young people,
certainly not the threat of prison.

Lots of people do drugs without anything happening to them."

Unfortunately, things do happen, from overdosing to overheating from
dancing all night at a rave while hyped up on ecstasy.

Dr. Grant Innes, chair of the department of emergency medicine at St.
Paul's Hospital, says he is seeing a greater number of people seeking
emergency help after taking drugs. (Reliable statistics, however, cannot be
tallied due to the impossibility of determining whether drugs, alcohol, or
a combination of the two are causing the symptoms.) Innes says that teens
and young adults are having heart attacks and arrhythmia related to cocaine
use; hyperthermia, convulsions, and seizures from ecstasy; or
schizophrenia-type paranoia from using crystal meth.

Addiction specialist Dr. Ray Baker, medical director of Vancouver's
HealthQuest Occupational Health Corp., says there are other, longer-term
side effects.

Scientists suspect that ecstasy may mess with the serotonergic nerve
network, permanently lowering people's serotonin levels and impairing their
ability to feel happiness.

Also, if someone spends Friday to Saturday in a drug-or alcohol-induced
teenage wasteland, or gets high during the week, they are missing out on
the subtle process of emotional maturation, the most difficult and
demanding, but important, task of adolescence, Baker says. "A drug that
interferes with learning, attention span, motivation, or memory may
interrupt the maturation process; the effect may be irreversible."

Most kids jeer at the notion that they'll become addicted, believing that
they are both invincible and immortal, Baker says. He says drug use must be
minimized during the teen years in order to thwart addiction. "One of the
biggest risk factors for addiction is the age of onset, so if you can delay
first use, that's a good thing.

Tobacco companies know this; if they don't get them by age 19, they're
probably not going to get them."

Even so, a growing number of experts, educators, and counsellors who work
in the area of illicit drugs question the "drug-free society" goal that is
at the heart of the "Just say 'no' " model.

The reality is, drugs, legal and illegal, are not going away, and they are
readily available, tempting experimentation. Kids, therefore, should be
given credible, accurate, practical information about drug use. This
ignites cries of protest from some people, especially police and doctors,
who believe that anything but a strict antidrug stance condones drug use.
They point to a Web site like PartySafe's--which includes warnings like
"don't mix GHB with alcohol"--as a virtual how-to manual.

Cpl. Rintoul says straying from the ideal of a drug-free society is a
"cop-out". "There are individuals out there," he says, "who think we should
teach kids to make reasonable choices about drugs, but that's utopian.

The reality is, people make choices, dumb choices, that cost lives or cause
injuries."

The importance of ensuring that young people are well-informed was
emphasized in a 2002 multigovernment-commissioned study called Pill
Testing, Ecstasy & Prevention that looked at drug use, especially ecstasy,
in three European Union countries: Germany, Netherlands, and Austria. A key
finding was the discovery that youth look to each other for information
about drugs. This highlights the notion that education by peers has a
strong potential not only to prevent nonusers from trying drugs but also to
reduce risky behaviours.

Ken Tupper, a UBC PhD student in the faculty of education, is studying
non-abstinence-based models of drug education.

Clean-cut and bespectacled, Tupper says he feels that illicit drugs can
have a role to play in western society similar to that of groups like the
American Indians, who have historically used mind-altering substances like
psilocybin (magic mushrooms), peyote, and ayahuasca in ceremonies. Drugs,
Tupper says, can be a catalyst in the quest for the meaning of life and a
driver to a spiritual awakening. "Kids using ecstasy often describe it as
being a spiritual experience," says Tupper, who credits his own youthful
trysts with LSD, ecstasy, and magic mushrooms for liberating a latent love
and talent for music.

Such ideas and concerns about drugs will be debated this fall in a series
of public meetings to develop a drug-education initiative for Vancouver,
according to the city's drug-policy coordinator, Donald MacPherson. "The
process will develop a comprehensive prevention program for Vancouver,
including community-based and school-based prevention," MacPherson says.

This is part of the famous Four Pillars drug strategy--with prevention
being one pillar--for reducing drug-related harm in the city, MacPherson
says, adding that education is a key part of prevention. "We have to accept
that we are a drug-consuming culture, although most of it is licit,"
MacPherson says. "We have to try to prevent harm within that context."

It is important to note the extent of drug use among teens.

The Burnaby-based McCreary Centre Society, a nonprofit group concerned with
youth health issues, conducted an adolescent health survey that shows that
in 1998, 40 percent of students used marijuana, up from 25 percent in 1992.
Thirteen percent had used pot 40 or more times.

There was a slight increase in cocaine use, up to seven percent in 1998
from five percent in 1992. Sixteen percent of students had tried magic
mushrooms, while 11 percent took LSD and ecstasy.

Six percent had inhaled glue and aerosols.

Although 76 percent of students had never used any of the "harder" drugs,
such as cocaine, hallucinogens, inhalants, amphetamines, or heroin, six
percent said they had used one or more of these substances 10 or more
times, according to the McCreary survey.

DANNY CHASE AND CHRIS WATT, both 18, sit in a booth at the New Amsterdam
Cafe on West Hastings Street, pulling deeply on a spliff.

They are long-time buddies from Delta; both dropped out of secondary school
when they became addicted to crystal meth for a year. Both have kicked the
habit, are working summer jobs, and will return to school in September. "If
I knew then what I know now, I wouldn't have done it," the cherub-faced
Watt says. "You have to learn about it firsthand," he adds, somewhat
sheepishly.

Chase, skinny, with sunglasses perched on his head, says: "Kids know drugs
are bad; they learn that starting in elementary school.

Education, it works on some kids, but for most they've still got to try it."

To Dr. Roger Tonkins, the attitudes that Chase and Watt express are pretty
normal. "Adolescents are notoriously concrete thinkers; thinking beyond the
moment is not their forte.

So the DARE program, based upon 'Don't do it because it's bad or criminal,'
doesn't work," says Tonkins, who chairs the board of directors at the
McCreary Centre Society. "Adolescents hear the messages, but it doesn't
influence their behaviour, so we need to rethink the whole paradigm."

There's obviously a need to revisit the issue.

If abstinence is shunned by thousands of curious teens and we know many
kids don't buy the "Just say 'no'" message but there is also a higher risk
of addiction among teen drug users, then how should drug education be
delivered, at what age, and what should the message contain?

Mark Haden, a clinical supervisor of addiction services at the Pacific
Spirit Community Health Centre in Vancouver, says one practical model is
the "reality-based approach to teens and drug education". The new mantra
is, "I really wish that you don't use drugs, but if you do, I want you to
use them in a way that is the least harmful that you can," Haden says.
"It's a complex message to give to kids and a tough message, because it's
mixed."

Haden borrows from the template for sex education. "We don't educate kids
to just say 'no' to sex. We know this results in increased teen
pregnancies. So we tell them the truth, provide them with prescriptions,
and try to help them understand the context of why they are having sex," he
says. "That's a pretty important model for us, and I think we should do the
same with drugs."

The decision by a teenager to become sexually active with one or more
partners is influenced by family dynamics, self-esteem, abuse, and poverty,
Haden says. The same factors determine drug use, he believes.

However, a drug-education system shouldn't start off discussing the
physiological effects of drugs like ecstasy but address issues like
self-esteem and communication with peers and family in ways that are
age-appropriate, he says. Then a school curriculum would evolve to include
discussions about anxiety, depression, and addictions, and why people
develop problems with such things as gambling or even sex, Haden says.
"Eventually, you talk about the drugs."

Drug problems, Haden adds, arise from a "constellation of social and
psychological problems.

If you talk about these things, it's hard for kids to rebel and view drugs
as being glamorous."

Tonkins says education programs need to be based upon an understanding of
what teens are "trying to solve". To this end, he says, the McCreary Centre
is in the early stages of creating a drug-education program that is heavily
reliant upon teen input. "They're the experts."

Michelle Fortin, the director of Vancouver's Watari research association,
which provides services to high-risk and street-involved youth, says her
group works with grades 4, 5, and 6 to help the students develop skills
that will help them cope with peer pressure.

Watari workers conduct role-playing that teaches kids how to say 'no'
without appearing dorky when offered a cigarette or when pressured to skip
school for the day, Fortin says. Watari also focuses on developing
communication skills and building self-esteem, which, at this age, Fortin
believes, is more important than discussions about drug and alcohol. "Kids
need to feel worthy of not being high or loaded," Fortin says. "It is about
empowering them and allowing them to recognize that they are capable of
making better choices." For this to happen on anything but an ad hoc basis,
there has to be a new emphasis on drug education.

In Vancouver, the amount of information most kids receive about drugs is
minimal, at best, according to Bill McNulty, a registered clinical
counsellor at Magee secondary school and a Richmond city councillor. B.C.
schools are required by the province to teach at least 10 hours of the CAPP
program every school year. Magee is unusual, devoting up to 25 hours a year
to CAPP, with four of those exclusively about drugs.

Some students from other schools, McNulty says, receive no drug education
whatsoever in their CAPP programs.

Additional drug education will be ineffective without educated teachers,
says UBC's Tupper, who rejects what he calls the "fear-based",
police-supported DARE program.

He advocates that universities should make drug-education classes mandatory
for those working toward a teaching degree. This knowledge should also be
ensconced within the curriculum, so that "we teach about drugs whenever the
opportunity arises, in biology and physical education, in social science,
or geography," Tupper says.

Ignorance will not protect young people from a world of illegal and legal
drugs. This means that parents must become well-informed through personal
study and research so they can engage in intelligent, nonjudgmental
conversations about drugs with their sons and daughters.

Those dancing at The World also have a responsibility to become educated,
if only to ensure that they know when to seek help for an overdosing,
overheating, or a zombied-out friend.

Still, knowledge will never stop teens or young adults from taking
chances--and making mistakes.

But knowledge that includes harm reduction at least makes them more aware
of how to avoid the dangers.