News (Media Awareness Project) - US HI: OPED: Punish Those Who Are Breaking The Real Law |
Title: | US HI: OPED: Punish Those Who Are Breaking The Real Law |
Published On: | 2003-10-03 |
Source: | Garden Island (HI) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-19 10:43:28 |
PUNISH THOSE WHO ARE BREAKING THE REAL LAW
Does anyone really believe that waving signs by the side of the road, or
'summit' meetings in Honolulu, or watching hour long TV documentaries, or
saying prayers, will have any appreciable impact on the Crystal Methamphetamine
problem?
Will the much publicized bust of one 'ice house' on Kauai really have any
effect on the supply of the drug available on the streets? Especially if the
defendants are given a slap on the wrist and turned free to ply their trade
again.
Did we not learn anything from the experiment with Prohibition? It didn't cut
down on the use of alcohol - just raised the price, made everyone a 'criminal'
and generated an underworld criminal supply system which switched to other
illegal trades when prohibition ended and still haunts us today.
We just had another in a long series of 'green harvest' marijuana eradication
raids. Have these costly programs eliminated pot? Far from it. However, they
have reduced supplies enough to drive the street cost so high that 'ice' is
cheap by comparison.
Throughout recorded history, many (most?) have turned to a variety of
psycho-active drugs for a variety of purposes. It is human nature to want to
feel good. It is the nature of civilization to put stress on people. There is
nothing inherently wrong with eating, drinking, or smoking something that helps
one to feel happy and relaxed. The Hawaiians used Kava. The American Indians
used Peyote. The Orientals used opium. The South Americans used Coca leaves.
Our kids eat Happy Meals.
Some of the things we currently use are deemed 'good' while others are 'evil'.
Why are chocolates, or Prozac, or Ritalin for hyperactive kids, or wine and
beer good for relaxing while marijuana, tobacco (which used to be 'good') and
other such things both natural and artificial considered evil and/or illegal.
The differentiation seems pretty arbitrary to me and is often subject to
change.
It is true that some 'recreational' products are much more habit-forming and
dangerous than others. But the danger is to the user - and we can not protect
people from themselves. Such an attempt often backfires. I believe that the
'ice epidemic' can be partially blamed on the marijuana raids which have driven
the cost high enough to make ice seem cheap by comparison. People are going to
use something - why drive them to something that is as habituating as crystal
meth?
So, what can we do other than waving signs? Prohibition, as well as our current
ongoing 'war on drugs' has shown that we will never stop the supply of things
that people want. Trying to do so is a waste of time, money and resources.
Punishing the users just fills up the jails or expensive 'treatment centers'
without appreciably changing much. Why not let anyone eat, smoke, drink, or
inject anything they voluntarily choose - without making them a criminal. It is
his or her own body and his or her life. If the user wants to waste it - so be
it. Society can never be 'my brother's keeper' nor should it try. Perhaps we
all need to read Orwell's 1984 again. It is sad to see someone throw away their
life and reject responsibility for themselves and their families - but it
should be their privilege.
The real danger to society is not those who are willing to waste their lives
being druggies. It is the means they use to obtain money to support their habit
- - from welfare enablements to stealing, robbing, breaking into cars etc. And
the higher the cost of the drugs becomes (because of the misguided 'war') the
more theft is required.
We should stop welfare payments, food stamps, and other handouts to those who
can work, yet choose not to (because of drug use or any other reason). Then put
all our money and effort from the 'war on drugs' into a 'war' on those who
break real laws with real victims. The system must then provide harsh (but
fairly applied) punishment. And I don't mean the Kauai Correctional facility
where inmates can promise to be good and get to go on beach picnics with the
warden. We need hard labor boot camps and chain gangs that are unpleasant
enough to make people think twice before going back. Besides getting these
people off the streets, it will help to beautify our island.
And I bet that seeing sweating offenders laboring along the roadside dressed in
black and white striped uniforms will be a far greater deterrent to potential
ice users than sign waving or TV commercials.
Forget the dealers. Forget the users. Punish those who break the real law.
Does anyone really believe that waving signs by the side of the road, or
'summit' meetings in Honolulu, or watching hour long TV documentaries, or
saying prayers, will have any appreciable impact on the Crystal Methamphetamine
problem?
Will the much publicized bust of one 'ice house' on Kauai really have any
effect on the supply of the drug available on the streets? Especially if the
defendants are given a slap on the wrist and turned free to ply their trade
again.
Did we not learn anything from the experiment with Prohibition? It didn't cut
down on the use of alcohol - just raised the price, made everyone a 'criminal'
and generated an underworld criminal supply system which switched to other
illegal trades when prohibition ended and still haunts us today.
We just had another in a long series of 'green harvest' marijuana eradication
raids. Have these costly programs eliminated pot? Far from it. However, they
have reduced supplies enough to drive the street cost so high that 'ice' is
cheap by comparison.
Throughout recorded history, many (most?) have turned to a variety of
psycho-active drugs for a variety of purposes. It is human nature to want to
feel good. It is the nature of civilization to put stress on people. There is
nothing inherently wrong with eating, drinking, or smoking something that helps
one to feel happy and relaxed. The Hawaiians used Kava. The American Indians
used Peyote. The Orientals used opium. The South Americans used Coca leaves.
Our kids eat Happy Meals.
Some of the things we currently use are deemed 'good' while others are 'evil'.
Why are chocolates, or Prozac, or Ritalin for hyperactive kids, or wine and
beer good for relaxing while marijuana, tobacco (which used to be 'good') and
other such things both natural and artificial considered evil and/or illegal.
The differentiation seems pretty arbitrary to me and is often subject to
change.
It is true that some 'recreational' products are much more habit-forming and
dangerous than others. But the danger is to the user - and we can not protect
people from themselves. Such an attempt often backfires. I believe that the
'ice epidemic' can be partially blamed on the marijuana raids which have driven
the cost high enough to make ice seem cheap by comparison. People are going to
use something - why drive them to something that is as habituating as crystal
meth?
So, what can we do other than waving signs? Prohibition, as well as our current
ongoing 'war on drugs' has shown that we will never stop the supply of things
that people want. Trying to do so is a waste of time, money and resources.
Punishing the users just fills up the jails or expensive 'treatment centers'
without appreciably changing much. Why not let anyone eat, smoke, drink, or
inject anything they voluntarily choose - without making them a criminal. It is
his or her own body and his or her life. If the user wants to waste it - so be
it. Society can never be 'my brother's keeper' nor should it try. Perhaps we
all need to read Orwell's 1984 again. It is sad to see someone throw away their
life and reject responsibility for themselves and their families - but it
should be their privilege.
The real danger to society is not those who are willing to waste their lives
being druggies. It is the means they use to obtain money to support their habit
- - from welfare enablements to stealing, robbing, breaking into cars etc. And
the higher the cost of the drugs becomes (because of the misguided 'war') the
more theft is required.
We should stop welfare payments, food stamps, and other handouts to those who
can work, yet choose not to (because of drug use or any other reason). Then put
all our money and effort from the 'war on drugs' into a 'war' on those who
break real laws with real victims. The system must then provide harsh (but
fairly applied) punishment. And I don't mean the Kauai Correctional facility
where inmates can promise to be good and get to go on beach picnics with the
warden. We need hard labor boot camps and chain gangs that are unpleasant
enough to make people think twice before going back. Besides getting these
people off the streets, it will help to beautify our island.
And I bet that seeing sweating offenders laboring along the roadside dressed in
black and white striped uniforms will be a far greater deterrent to potential
ice users than sign waving or TV commercials.
Forget the dealers. Forget the users. Punish those who break the real law.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...