News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: PUB LTE: Americans Should Butt Out Of Canadian Pot |
Title: | CN BC: PUB LTE: Americans Should Butt Out Of Canadian Pot |
Published On: | 2003-10-13 |
Source: | Vancouver Sun (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-19 09:30:24 |
AMERICANS SHOULD BUTT OUT OF CANADIAN POT INITIATIVES
Re: Drug czar takes pot shot at Canada, Oct. 10
I want to add my voice to the long list of Canadians who support Prime
Minister Jean Chretien's initiatives on marijuana legislation. I believe that:
1. Mr. Chretien understands that a society founded on principles of liberal
democracy must lean toward tolerating, not criminalizing and regulating,
alternative viewpoints. If we truly live in an age of "freedom of choice
and action," where the state can no longer enforce adherence to a specific
religious doctrine, it follows that we cannot enforce the morality that is
inextricably bound up in such religious convictions.
Hence, the law necessarily becomes more of a neutral arbitrator and less of
a narrow-minded morality enforcer. Whether smoking pot is right or wrong is
not as important as whether the Canadian government can allow individuals
to act in a way that is contrary to what the U.S. government thinks is correct.
2. I am proud that Canada is moving towards greater acceptance of all forms
of variation from the norm. Most other repressive governments do not
advocate that every other state should follow their rules: They are content
to rule over their citizens. The U.S., however, seeks to enforce a certain
standard of behaviour on other civilized countries.
Joshua Hergesheimer
Vancouver
Re: Drug czar takes pot shot at Canada, Oct. 10
I want to add my voice to the long list of Canadians who support Prime
Minister Jean Chretien's initiatives on marijuana legislation. I believe that:
1. Mr. Chretien understands that a society founded on principles of liberal
democracy must lean toward tolerating, not criminalizing and regulating,
alternative viewpoints. If we truly live in an age of "freedom of choice
and action," where the state can no longer enforce adherence to a specific
religious doctrine, it follows that we cannot enforce the morality that is
inextricably bound up in such religious convictions.
Hence, the law necessarily becomes more of a neutral arbitrator and less of
a narrow-minded morality enforcer. Whether smoking pot is right or wrong is
not as important as whether the Canadian government can allow individuals
to act in a way that is contrary to what the U.S. government thinks is correct.
2. I am proud that Canada is moving towards greater acceptance of all forms
of variation from the norm. Most other repressive governments do not
advocate that every other state should follow their rules: They are content
to rule over their citizens. The U.S., however, seeks to enforce a certain
standard of behaviour on other civilized countries.
Joshua Hergesheimer
Vancouver
Member Comments |
No member comments available...