News (Media Awareness Project) - US MA: Editorial: Bong Hits For The First Amendment |
Title: | US MA: Editorial: Bong Hits For The First Amendment |
Published On: | 2007-06-27 |
Source: | Daily News Tribune (Waltham, MA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-12 03:20:05 |
BONG HITS FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT
In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that students do not "shed their
constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the
schoolhouse gate." It was a good ruling with exceptions that allowed
school officials to bar speech that advocated dangerous or illegal
conduct or was substantially disruptive.
The Roberts Supreme Court has expanded schools' powers to regulate
speech in a case in which the speech in question was described as
"cryptic," by Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority, and as
"nonsense," Justice John Paul Stevens dissenting. A more rugged
description would be just stupid.
The phrase was the now infamous "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS," words now
enshrined in First Amendment lore. It was written on a 14-foot banner
that Alaska high-school student Joseph Frederick unfurled as the
Olympic Torch Relay was coming through Juneau.
Frederick was not on school property - he was on a sidewalk opposite
his school - but the presence of the students along the relay route
was school-sponsored and -supervised. Frederick said he displayed the
banner, whose inscription even he found meaningless, solely to get on
television.
Why, oh why, do these things become federal cases? Nonetheless,
principal Deborah Morse confiscated the banner and suspended
Frederick for 10 days on the grounds that the message conflicted with
the school's mission of fighting illegal-drug use.
By 5-4, the court agreed.
But Frederick did not seek to advocate or persuade. Wrote Stevens:
"The notion that the message on this banner would actually persuade
either the average student or even the dumbest one to change his or
her behavior is most implausible."
By the majority's reasoning - and its confidence that it could divine
meaning in "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS" - the principal could have equally
confiscated the banner for impermissible promotion of religion during
a school activity.
Under the "bong hits" ruling, school officials gained the court's
backing for making students check at least part of their
constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate.
In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that students do not "shed their
constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the
schoolhouse gate." It was a good ruling with exceptions that allowed
school officials to bar speech that advocated dangerous or illegal
conduct or was substantially disruptive.
The Roberts Supreme Court has expanded schools' powers to regulate
speech in a case in which the speech in question was described as
"cryptic," by Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority, and as
"nonsense," Justice John Paul Stevens dissenting. A more rugged
description would be just stupid.
The phrase was the now infamous "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS," words now
enshrined in First Amendment lore. It was written on a 14-foot banner
that Alaska high-school student Joseph Frederick unfurled as the
Olympic Torch Relay was coming through Juneau.
Frederick was not on school property - he was on a sidewalk opposite
his school - but the presence of the students along the relay route
was school-sponsored and -supervised. Frederick said he displayed the
banner, whose inscription even he found meaningless, solely to get on
television.
Why, oh why, do these things become federal cases? Nonetheless,
principal Deborah Morse confiscated the banner and suspended
Frederick for 10 days on the grounds that the message conflicted with
the school's mission of fighting illegal-drug use.
By 5-4, the court agreed.
But Frederick did not seek to advocate or persuade. Wrote Stevens:
"The notion that the message on this banner would actually persuade
either the average student or even the dumbest one to change his or
her behavior is most implausible."
By the majority's reasoning - and its confidence that it could divine
meaning in "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS" - the principal could have equally
confiscated the banner for impermissible promotion of religion during
a school activity.
Under the "bong hits" ruling, school officials gained the court's
backing for making students check at least part of their
constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...