Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US: Column: With Little Chance Of Pardon, Aaron Sentence Is Barbaric
Title:US: Column: With Little Chance Of Pardon, Aaron Sentence Is Barbaric
Published On:2003-12-26
Source:Pasadena Star-News, The (CA)
Fetched On:2008-01-19 02:17:36
WITH LITTLE CHANCE OF PARDON, AARON SENTENCE IS BARBARIC

Friday, December 26, 2003 - WHEN he was governor of Texas, George W.
Bush got burned for performing an act of clemency. In 1995, after
local law enforcement officials supported one Steve Raney, Bush
pardoned Raney, who had been convicted on a misdemeanor drug charge in
1988 for growing marijuana in his backyard. The pardon enabled Raney
to become a deputy constable. Within four months of his pardon,
however, Raney was arrested for stealing cocaine from a suspect during
a roadside arrest. It was an embarrassing episode for the governor.

Today, no one would accuse President Bush of overusing his
constitutional power to pardon federal criminals who have served their
sentences but want a clean record. As Washington staffers enjoy the
glut of glitzy holiday parties, too many prisoners are sitting in
federal penitentiaries serving overly long sentences for nonviolent
first-time or minor offenses. They are victims of draconian federal
mandatory minimum sentencing rules.

Clarence Aaron is serving a lifetime sentence for introducing two
dealers when he was a Louisiana college student in 1992. Aaron had no
prior record. He was a bit player. He had no history of violence. He
has been a model prisoner. Yet, with no parole in a federal system
where life means life, Aaron is facing a long life behind bars until
he dies. His sentence is an outrage.

Yet the small community of activists and attorneys who are working for
reforms in the law and pardons for inmates like Aaron have all but
given up. The Bush administration has rejected more than 2,400
applications, according to The Wall Street Journal. The president has
granted a mere 11 pardons to individuals who were convicted long ago.
That's nice, but Bush has not commuted a single sentence.

There are more than 170,000 people in federal penal institutions, and
yet not one sentence seems too long to President Bush.

Lawyer Margaret C. Love, who specializes in pardons, summarized: Bush
"has decided there's no upside (in this) for him.' So the bustle from
groups such as Families Against Mandatory Minimums to win holiday-time
commutations is muted. Reformers expect to get more results from
states with Republican governors than from the Bush White House.

The worst of it is: Everyone knows that federal drug sentences can be
too harsh on low-level drug offenders. Federal judges and Supreme
Court justices are speaking out against rules that make it difficult
to shorten sentences for small fish. But Washington politicians won't
fix what is broken lest they look soft on drugs.

In the past, I've called various federal officials and asked if they
could tell me if there was a reason something that wouldn't show up in
a rap sheet as to why Aaron's sentence was as long as that of Robert
Hanssen, the FBI-agent-turned-traitor. They have no real answer.

The best anyone can say is that Aaron broke the law. (True, and thus
Aaron deserved to serve time in prison. But it's also true that the
feds enhanced Aaron's sentence by calculating the amount of drugs that
might have been dealt not the drugs actually dealt. Also, the feds
lengthened Aaron's sentence by charging him for distribution of crack,
when it was cocaine that changed hands.)

In truth, lawmen know that Aaron's long sentence has more to do with
the fact that he failed to testify against other drug dealers who were
able to cut deals in order to reduce their sentences than with the
drugs themselves. All but one of the players around Aaron has been
released from prison despite prior arrests. The kingpin behind the
Aaron deal served seven years and then was set free.

Aaron, then, is in prison for life, not to punish him for drug
trafficking but for his silence.

Aaron's attorney, Gregg Shapiro of Boston, worries that the lesson
Bush may have drawn from the Raney case is "not to grant anyone
clemency. That's the wrong lesson because there are a lot of
meritorious cases.'

If a developing country issued this sentence for this crime, most
Americans would call it barbaric. And they'd be right.
Member Comments
No member comments available...