NOT AGAINST DRUG WAR? YOU'RE FOR IT

Your elected leaders and news editors need your help with following
challenge: Give one good reason for continuation of the so-called "War on
Drugs" without lying.

Be reminded that prohibition has nothing to do with especially dangerous
drugs that are worse than legal alternatives or prevention of drug abuse or
dependency problems. Anyone who states otherwise is lying. Editors have
severe problems with my other contentions:

Leaders/editors who refuse to denounce prohibition are drug war advocates.

Reprinting articles that suggest the top three lies are true is dishonest.

All drug war advocates are by definition pathological liars, due to their
inability to respond to my challenges.

Can any readers answer the challenge? Are all my other contentions fair?
Can you base a "difference of opinion" on lies? How would you hold
leaders/editors accountable to the truth?

J. T. Barrie

Philomath