GIVING IN TO PRESSURE

Perhaps the most disconcerting aspect of the Supreme Court of Canada's 6-3
decision week to uphold the laws prohibiting possession of marijuana is the
reaction of John Walters, the United States' drug czar.

Walters was positively abuzz with excitement upon learning that Canada's
top court had decided against ruling that the possession law was
unconstitutional.

This is, of course, not new. When the federal Liberals had drafted a bill
to decriminalize simple possession of pot, Martin Cauchon, then the justice
minister, actually flew to Washington last spring to essentially obtain
permission from U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft to liberalize marijuana
laws here.

That Cauchon presented the pot proposal to a foreign country before
allowing Canada's own House of Commons to view it was astounding. That the
issue didn't generate a wave of outrage among the public is even more
appalling.

When Jean Chretien had introduced the original bill to decriminalize simple
possession of pot - a bill that will be re-introduced next year in a much
watered-down form - Walters and the Bush administration actually had the
audacity to charge that Canada was the only country in the West to
mishandle its drug policy.

Such a charge is laughable, when one considers how corrupt and inept the
U.S. war on drugs really is: The CIA imported cocaine to sell on American
street corners to raise money to fund the Contras in their guerrilla war
against President Daniel Ortega's Sandinista government in Nicaragua in the
1980s. This is not some wild-eyed conspiracy theory. It is a documented
fact presented in Senate hearings in Washington.

In its majority opinion, the Supreme Court of Canada wrote that "chronic
(marijuana) users may suffer serious health problems. Vulnerable groups are
at a particular risk . . ."

If health concerns are reason enough to continue to make criminals out of
people who indulge in a joint or two, can we expect, then, a challenge to
the current law that deems cigarettes, alcohol and sugar legal?

It is true that the courts exists to interpret, not make, law. And simple
possession will probably be decriminalized sometime next year.

But the revamped bill, heavy on grow-ops and "repeat users," appears to be
another example of capitulating to U.S. pressure to continue demonizing a
drug that is no more harmful than many, many legal drugs.