News (Media Awareness Project) - US NJ: LTE: Back Up Anti-Bush Comments With Cash |
Title: | US NJ: LTE: Back Up Anti-Bush Comments With Cash |
Published On: | 2004-01-06 |
Source: | Ocean County Observer (NJ) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-19 01:21:58 |
BACK UP ANTI-BUSH COMMENTS WITH CASH
Anti-Bush billionaire
George Soros has stated that he would pledge millions of his personal
fortune to soft money organizations with the focus of defeating the
president in next year's election, calling it "a matter of life and
death." When challenged if he would trade his $7 billion fortune to
unseat President Bush, Soros opened his mouth, then closed it. He was
left speechless.
Would he become poor to beat Bush?
He replied, "If someone guaranteed it."
Of course, the 2004 election is far from a guarantee, particularly to
the Democratic nominee. But, if this is really a "matter of life and
death" as Soros claimed, how could he even hesitate on trading his
fortune for life? If he actually felt his life or the lives of loved
ones were at risk, what kind of man hesitates in choosing life? I can
only surmise that he truly doesn't believe what he claims.
And by the way, someone needs to ask Soros exactly whose life is at
risk if Bush wins re-election? The last time I looked, we had war
declared against us by fanatical Muslims and, thanks to Bush, we
haven't been attacked on our homeland since the opening salvo of World
War III on Sept. 11, 2001. If anyone's lives are at risk, it's those
of the bad guys.
That said, it should be plain to everyone that it's a matter of life
and death if Bush doesn't win and some spaghetti-spined liberal
Democrat gets into the White House. Funny thing: That's exactly what
Terror Inc., along with the Democratic Party, is praying for. They
hate it that an aggressive Republican is taking the fight to them,
disrupting their operations, and they're doing everything possible in
Iraq, as the Democratic Party is here, to sway American public opinion
against Bush.
As I see it, it's a matter of life and death if Soros succeeds in his
focus to oust the president, but I don't think he will. Why? Because
it's obvious he really doesn't believe that it's a "life and death"
cause. He's just throwing money away for the sake of publicity and to
give aid and comfort to the enemy.
Eugene R. Dunn
Medford, N.Y.
Anti-Bush billionaire
George Soros has stated that he would pledge millions of his personal
fortune to soft money organizations with the focus of defeating the
president in next year's election, calling it "a matter of life and
death." When challenged if he would trade his $7 billion fortune to
unseat President Bush, Soros opened his mouth, then closed it. He was
left speechless.
Would he become poor to beat Bush?
He replied, "If someone guaranteed it."
Of course, the 2004 election is far from a guarantee, particularly to
the Democratic nominee. But, if this is really a "matter of life and
death" as Soros claimed, how could he even hesitate on trading his
fortune for life? If he actually felt his life or the lives of loved
ones were at risk, what kind of man hesitates in choosing life? I can
only surmise that he truly doesn't believe what he claims.
And by the way, someone needs to ask Soros exactly whose life is at
risk if Bush wins re-election? The last time I looked, we had war
declared against us by fanatical Muslims and, thanks to Bush, we
haven't been attacked on our homeland since the opening salvo of World
War III on Sept. 11, 2001. If anyone's lives are at risk, it's those
of the bad guys.
That said, it should be plain to everyone that it's a matter of life
and death if Bush doesn't win and some spaghetti-spined liberal
Democrat gets into the White House. Funny thing: That's exactly what
Terror Inc., along with the Democratic Party, is praying for. They
hate it that an aggressive Republican is taking the fight to them,
disrupting their operations, and they're doing everything possible in
Iraq, as the Democratic Party is here, to sway American public opinion
against Bush.
As I see it, it's a matter of life and death if Soros succeeds in his
focus to oust the president, but I don't think he will. Why? Because
it's obvious he really doesn't believe that it's a "life and death"
cause. He's just throwing money away for the sake of publicity and to
give aid and comfort to the enemy.
Eugene R. Dunn
Medford, N.Y.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...