Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US TN: A Safe Home Or A Jail?
Title:US TN: A Safe Home Or A Jail?
Published On:2004-01-29
Source:Metro Pulse (TN)
Fetched On:2008-01-18 22:45:03
A SAFE HOME OR A JAIL?

KCDC's No-Trespass List And Roadchecks Are Intended To Protect Residents,
But Critics Say They Create A Police State For The Poor

Before Beth moved her family into an apartment in Christenberry Heights'
public-housing project, she gave her son a bit of advice.

"I told my son, 'You have a problem, you go to the police.' I've changed
that since I've lived in Christenberry," says Beth, who asked that her name
not be used. "They definitely treat people who live in the projects
differently."

Beth, of course, has a reason to hold a grudge. Last year, she was evicted
from her apartment and placed on KCDC's "no trespassing" list, forbidden
from stepping on any KCDC property. She was evicted after police stopped
her at a routine ID check in Christenberry Heights.

"My husband was with me. We are separated, but he was visiting his little
boy," she says. "He started fidgeting. He always gets nervous around cops."

As they approached the police, she heard her husband fidgeting next to her,
but she didn't pay him any attention. "Apparently what he was doing was
putting marijuana in my purse," she says.

At the checkpoint, she showed the officer her driver's license and KCDC ID
card. The officer then asked what was in a plastic bag he saw jutting out
of her purse and she showed it to him. "I was hoping it was something the
kids had stuck in my purse, like a half-eaten peanut butter sandwich," she
says.

After some incredulous dirty looks at her husband, he soon confessed that
the illicit plant was his. But it was in Beth's possession, so the police
charged her.

This may not sound like a big deal. The ID checks at Knoxville's public
housing developments are common enough. They're designed to try to insulate
KCDC's poor-and vulnerable-population from drugs, violence, and bad people
who would prey on them.

But critics say the ID checks and no-trespass list force people to live in
a police state just because they're poor. The agency's no-trespass list
keeps many young people from being able to visit their parents,
grandparents, children and spouses.

"I think a lot of the people in there really didn't care for many of the
officers patrolling. You didn't feel like they were trying to help you.
They had an attitude that they were better than you. Like we were all crack
dealers and prostitutes," Beth says. "I admit I had a few crack-dealer
neighbors. I even called the cops on them myself once.... There were
definitely people in there that shouldn't be there. But I felt like I was
living in a jail cell because the police were always out there."

"If We See Nothing Suspicious"

It's an unseasonably warm January Saturday evening, and Sgt. Mark Fortner
and two other officers have stationed themselves at the end of a one-way
street in Western Heights, the largest public-housing development in the
city. Their three police cruisers are parked along the side of the road,
and officers stand in the street, holding flashlights. If they recognize
the residents, they let them pass. Others they ask for KCDC ID. If they're
not residents, the officers ask what they're doing on the property. Many
are just visitors, which is fine. The police try to determine if they have
a legitimate reason for being there. And police make sure they aren't on
the no-trespass list. "We're looking to make sure the folks who are coming
through live there or have a legitimate purpose to be on KCDC property,"
Fortner says.

"You can see how quickly we're done with folks who live here. It's just a
small inconvenience for their safety," Fortner says. "If we see nothing
suspicious, they're out of here in 30 seconds."

Tonight's checkpoint is not far from a notorious drug-dealing spot. Because
of its size, Western Heights accounts for about half the drug arrests on
KCDC property, Fortner says. This one-way street is the only way to move
away from the dealing spot by automobile.

The ID checkpoints have to take place within the developments, on streets
the city rents to KCDC. Police checkpoints on public roads must have court
approval and be announced ahead of time.

Despite the warm weather, it's relatively quiet. The officers don't find
much suspicious. Earlier, they sniffed the aroma of pot in one car. But
they only found a few seeds of the illicit plant. "Somebody had obviously
been smoking marijuana in the car earlier in the day," Fortner says. "But
there wasn't enough to make an analysis." The driver was cited for an
expired registration, however.

The officers stage the checkpoints about every night during the warmer
months, in all the various housing projects. They usually don't have them
too much after dark. "We don't want to put anybody in danger. And we don't
want to inconvenience the residents late at night," he says.

"You get a range of reactions. Some people tell you they appreciate it;
others don't like it. We've had people offer us refreshments," he says.
"We're trying to keep the bad element out and curb any illegal activity
before it occurs."

Officers do notice that some people avoid the checkpoints. "They'll tell
folks there's police down the street. That's OK too because you've curbed
some activity just by officers' presence."

Some cars will turn around or obviously change their driving route. "If
they were going to turn that way and didn't-well, they really haven't
committed a crime. It's obvious they didn't want to talk to the police for
some reason. But we've prevented them from coming on the property," Fortner
says.

Fortner believes the checks have made a difference. "There are nights when
I catch a stolen car, drugs and a gun," he says. "Most of the weapons
seized [on KCDC property] have been at ID checkpoints."

One SUV drives past the police obliviously. "Whoa! Whoa!" the officer
yells. The couple stops and the driver, a man, rolls down his window. The
woman in the passenger seat says they were visiting her sister, but she
wasn't home. He checks the driver's license, and then lets him drive on.

Another man in a white pickup says he's from Kentucky, and he'd been
looking for clunkers to race in a smashup derby. "He said he got lost," the
officer tells Fortner. "He said, 'How do you get out of here?' I believe
that story. It's too strange not to believe."

"A Place Where They're Not Afraid"

No-trespassing lists are not unique to Knoxville, although public housing
authorities have discretion in how to enforce them.

"No trespassing came as part of a mandate for HUD to provide some system to
make our properties not open range for criminal activities," says Billie
Spicuzza, KCDC's vice president of housing. "So many of our clients are
vulnerable because they're low-income, and there's a lot of single parents."

Although KCDC is a quasi-public agency, receiving public money, Spicuzza
says it has a right to keep its developments secure. "We're acting as a
private rental property would anywhere in the city," she says. "If you
drive home and you saw two or three people on your street corner, and you
didn't know who they were, and your neighbors didn't know who they were,
and you couldn't figure out what they were doing there, you'd most likely
call the police."

The agency contracts with the Knoxville Police Department to provide
additional security. The officers are being paid by KCDC-although they'll
answer to calls for life-threatening emergencies outside the housing
developments.

There are four officers on weekdays, eight on the weekends working for
KCDC. Officers on regular duty will also respond to calls in KCDC properties.

The no-trespass list is an extension of KCDC's-and the nation's- public
housing regulations, which forbid people with recent criminal history from
being eligible to live on its property. Charges for drugs, violence, weapon
possession, or assault in the past three years disqualifies people for
housing. A conviction for being a sex offender or operating a meth lab will
get people banned from public housing for life. Drug possession or violence
will get tenants evicted and put on the no-trespass list. Even if charges
are later dropped, they could still be evicted, because evictions are a
civil matter and don't require the same burden of proof.

Spicuzza says the no-trespass list makes perfect sense when viewed along
with its housing policies. "Why would you refuse to house someone with a
criminal record but allow them to stand on our streets and do whatever they
want?" she says. "We think people deserve to be housed in a place where
they're not afraid," she adds.

There are more than 1,000 people on KCDC's no-trespass list. Police
officers who patrol KCDC property have copies of the list. "Very few people
whose names are on that list aren't known to the police," Spicuzza says.
Officers recommend to her who should be on the list, but KCDC makes the
decision, she says.

Doug Blaze, head of the University of Tennessee's law-school clinic,
challenged KCDC in federal court in 1997 over its no-trespass list. The
court sided with KCDC.

"Public housing administrators have a difficult challenge in trying to
protect their clients. Our concern was, how is the decision made, and also
the potential to split up families," Blaze says.

"We were concerned about fathers being able to visit their kids and people
being able to visit their parents," he adds. "There's a potential to
restrict access to families beyond what is needed. We have to be real
careful we administer these policies fairly. I understand why they're doing
it."

Spicuzza doesn't have much sympathy. "If one truly is there to visit their
mother or brother or child, they'd be in that apartment, not out on the
street corner," Spicuzza says. "If one does have those on-going problems
[with drugs, violence, or crime], I don't see how it benefits people of our
developments to let them on our property."

But the lawsuit did lead to some changes. KCDC created an appeal process,
providing a way for people to get off the no-trespass list.

"We believe people's lives change. After [the list] was in place for a
while, we decided there should be a way to get off," Spicuzza says.

She has the last word on who goes on or off the list, but she gets
recommendations from police. "I don't always follow the recommendations,"
she says.

There have been 134 appeals made to getting off the list in the past five
years. Spicuzza says she's granted 37 of those.

"What we're looking for is a change in behavior patterns," she says.

"People Who Look Like You"

Deno McCoy doesn't understand why he's not on KCDC's no-trespass list, but
he's thankful he isn't. The three-time convicted felon doesn't live in KCDC
housing, but he has several family members and friends who do. His
avocation with Tribe One-doing outreach work among Knoxville's gang members
and drug dealers, as well as those at risk for becoming such-brings him
regularly on KCDC property.

He says most of the people he knows are on the list. And most of them
trespass, sneaking on the property or just taking their chances.

"They got kids. They got family," he says. "If you pay child support,
you've got a legal right to see your child's living environment. But they
can't [legally] go see their kids."

The projects are also just familiar to many of the people on the list.
"That's the way some people live. They can't go to West Knoxville and hang
out. It's just being there with people who look like them. That's home.
It's where we're from. Where we were raised. Now you got someone saying,
'You can't go there.'"

McCoy says he can see the checkpoints doing some good. When he was
surviving through criminal means, he would be cautious to avoid the ID
checks. "I can see how when I was in the streets, if I had guns in the car
with me, I would not take a certain street," he says. "So to a certain
extent, it's protecting lives in the community. But it's also imprisoning
people in the projects.

"You go inside those streets and everybody in the car is subject to a
search. It communicates that if you come here we're going to treat
everybody in the car like a criminal. Even your grandma. They've got the
right to search everybody in the car just because you're in a certain part
of Knoxville."

The no-trespass rule adds another burden to people trying to break out of a
cycle of poverty and crime. If people who live in West Knoxville end up
doing time, when they get out of jail, they'll be able to return to their
families as they try to put their lives together, McCoy says. But a poor
convict whose family lives in an inner-city housing project doesn't have
that luxury. "They're not out in West Knoxville putting people on
no-trespass. If you go to jail and get out, they're making it harder for
you to get your life back together. They're doing that in the inner city,"
he says.

Some people end up rebelling against the policies. "You might see a grandma
come out and yell 'Roadblock' not because she wants to help a criminal but
because she don't want to see a young brother or sister go to jail."

Most of the people interviewed by Metro Pulse had mixed feelings about the
no-trespass list, ID checkpoints and police behavior.

"I have no problem with the no-trespassing policy as long as the officers
are arresting those who are on the no-trespassing list," says Margaret Lee
of the Lonsdale Tenants Association. "A year or two ago, they were getting
everybody. They were accosting everybody.

"Don't get me wrong, we need a police presence here. But sometimes they're
bothering the wrong people. Some of the older citizens were complaining
they couldn't sit on their porch. The officers were coming up telling them
they couldn't sit on their porch," she adds. "What I've been told is
sometimes they're sitting on their porch. Police pull up and ask to see
their ID, which doesn't sound right to me. If the person didn't live there,
they wouldn't be sitting on their porch. Sometimes the people get kind of
ticked off, words get exchanged, and they get cited. Sometimes the police
officers get overzealous."

Lee doesn't mind the road ID checks. "I'm not breaking the law, so I don't
mind being stopped. We do have people coming in here buying drugs. Most of
the police officers are here every day, so they know who lives here. They
should be stopping cars they don't know. Do I have I problem with it? No."

Angel Romero is one of the few people to have gotten off the no-trespass
list. She was put on the list in 1995 when she was 18; police searched her
apartment and found drugs. She routinely trespassed to see her mother, who
lived in a KCDC unit. "I had to sneak to go see her. Sometimes I'd have to
park and walk to see her," Romero says.

Romero-who works for Tribe One-asked to be taken off the list two years
ago. At first, she was put on probation and was allowed only in the
Lonsdale development, where Tribe One's office was located at the time,
from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. during the week. Last August she was taken off the
list completely.

"I wanted off of trespass because it was my right. I made some mistakes.
The judge told me, you do this. I did it. I wanted my payoff," she says.

Romero says she doesn't have a problem with having a no-trespass list for
those who commit crime on KCDC property. But she believes police abuse it.
"They put them on [no-]trespassing for anything. It gives them the right to
stop them and arrest them next time," she says. "It gives them a right to
harass young black men and women. They found a way to abuse that, to harass
young black men not doing crime."

Creating a safe environment for public-housing residents requires a lot
more than banning certain people, she says. "If they really cared about
safety, they'd create programs and places for these young people to go,"
she says. "It made a lot of sense that someone got killed on a basketball
court to get rid of the basketball court," she says ironically. "True
enough, no one else got killed on a basketball court." McCoy says that
policies like no-trespassing end up dividing the community more than
anything. "You've got your young hip-hop people rebelling, and you've got
your senior citizens struggling to survive. People are convinced things are
bad because of young people. They found a way to play people off each
other. Once you've got them fighting themselves, you sit back and watch
them die."

The roadchecks themselves keep people from physically moving through the
development-which McCoy sees as an apt metaphor. "The system is designed to
be still," he says. "Just be still. Don't move. It's a jail with no bars."

He Was On No-Trespass

Two weeks ago, in the wee hours of a Thursday morning, police responded to
a report of gunfire at Austin Homes. Sgt. Tony Willis came up on a man who
tried to flee. Willis followed when the man suddenly turned and fired 10 or
11 shots from his Glock handgun. Willis and another officer returned fire
and, although all three were nearly at point-blank range, no one was injured.

The suspect, 24-year-old Ahmad Dalb Wells, was charged with attempted
murder. Wells had already been awaiting sentencing on an aggravated assault
charge.

"He is a known offender with a significant rap sheet," police chief Phil
Keith described him at a press conference that morning.

He was also on the no-trespass list. Police point to the incident as
justification for the program, and it may well be.

But it also demonstrates something else. Being on the list didn't stop
Wells from going into Austin Homes that morning.
Member Comments
No member comments available...