News (Media Awareness Project) - US MO: Bill Would Penalize People For Being High |
Title: | US MO: Bill Would Penalize People For Being High |
Published On: | 2004-03-10 |
Source: | Columbia Missourian (MO) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-18 19:04:24 |
BILL WOULD PENALIZE PEOPLE FOR BEING HIGH
Sponsors say that they want to close a "loophole" in current drug laws.
Missourians under the influence of drugs could be arrested for being high if
a proposed House bill is passed.
Reps. Brian Baker, R-Belton, and Therese Sander, R-Moberly, proposed House
Bill No. 983, which would make it a Class A misdemeanor to be under the
influence of a controlled substance. Current law prohibits only the
possession, purchase, distribution or manufacturing of a controlled
substance.
Rep. THERESE SANDER, R-Moberly Baker said drug laws contain a "loophole"
that prohibits police from charging someone with a drug violation without
physical evidence.
Under the proposed legislation, for example, police could arrest someone for
being under the influence of cocaine even without physical evidence that the
person was in possession of the drug.
Baker said the bill is a protective measure to keep people from engaging in
drug use.
"This closes that loophole," Baker said.
Capt. Mike Martin, investigative commander for the Columbia Police
Department, said the bill would help strengthen laws against driving while
under the influence of drugs, which can be just as dangerous as drunken
driving.
But he predicted no change in the department's investigative procedures if
the bill were to pass.
"I think we would continue to do the things that we're doing," Martin said.
He said the department employs three drug recognition experts, or DREs, who
help determine whether someone is under the influence.
One of those experts, Candy Corman, said that in addition to looking for
obvious signs of impairment, DREs measure the blood pressure and pulse rates
of people suspected of being on drugs.
Measurements that are abnormally high could be a sign of drug intoxication,
Corman said.
DREs also look for "clinical indicators of actions, "such as teeth grinding
and fidgety movement.
Corman echoed Martin's opinion that the bill "might make officers more
aware" of the importance of enforcing laws against driving while
intoxicated.
Some Columbia residents were unimpressed with the proposed legislation.
Brandy Stallman, who works at the Columbia Mall, said that people have used
drugs for social and recreational purposes for centuries. The proposed bill
would do nothing to change that, she said.
"It's just ridiculous," Stallman said of HB 983. "Nothing has stopped people
(from using drugs) so far."
Tim Colbert, a Columbia resident who was shopping at the mall on a recent
afternoon, said the bill could help keep drivers who are under the influence
off the road. He said poor driving performance is an indicator of drug
impairment, so officers should be able to arrest someone based on those
observations.
However, Colbert said, "police could abuse the law."
He said police should not be allowed to arrest someone because "they look
suspicious. To me, that's not proof."
The bill has been referred to the House Committee of Crime Prevention and
Public Safety, but a vote on the measure has yet to be scheduled.
Sponsors say that they want to close a "loophole" in current drug laws.
Missourians under the influence of drugs could be arrested for being high if
a proposed House bill is passed.
Reps. Brian Baker, R-Belton, and Therese Sander, R-Moberly, proposed House
Bill No. 983, which would make it a Class A misdemeanor to be under the
influence of a controlled substance. Current law prohibits only the
possession, purchase, distribution or manufacturing of a controlled
substance.
Rep. THERESE SANDER, R-Moberly Baker said drug laws contain a "loophole"
that prohibits police from charging someone with a drug violation without
physical evidence.
Under the proposed legislation, for example, police could arrest someone for
being under the influence of cocaine even without physical evidence that the
person was in possession of the drug.
Baker said the bill is a protective measure to keep people from engaging in
drug use.
"This closes that loophole," Baker said.
Capt. Mike Martin, investigative commander for the Columbia Police
Department, said the bill would help strengthen laws against driving while
under the influence of drugs, which can be just as dangerous as drunken
driving.
But he predicted no change in the department's investigative procedures if
the bill were to pass.
"I think we would continue to do the things that we're doing," Martin said.
He said the department employs three drug recognition experts, or DREs, who
help determine whether someone is under the influence.
One of those experts, Candy Corman, said that in addition to looking for
obvious signs of impairment, DREs measure the blood pressure and pulse rates
of people suspected of being on drugs.
Measurements that are abnormally high could be a sign of drug intoxication,
Corman said.
DREs also look for "clinical indicators of actions, "such as teeth grinding
and fidgety movement.
Corman echoed Martin's opinion that the bill "might make officers more
aware" of the importance of enforcing laws against driving while
intoxicated.
Some Columbia residents were unimpressed with the proposed legislation.
Brandy Stallman, who works at the Columbia Mall, said that people have used
drugs for social and recreational purposes for centuries. The proposed bill
would do nothing to change that, she said.
"It's just ridiculous," Stallman said of HB 983. "Nothing has stopped people
(from using drugs) so far."
Tim Colbert, a Columbia resident who was shopping at the mall on a recent
afternoon, said the bill could help keep drivers who are under the influence
off the road. He said poor driving performance is an indicator of drug
impairment, so officers should be able to arrest someone based on those
observations.
However, Colbert said, "police could abuse the law."
He said police should not be allowed to arrest someone because "they look
suspicious. To me, that's not proof."
The bill has been referred to the House Committee of Crime Prevention and
Public Safety, but a vote on the measure has yet to be scheduled.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...