NOT ADVOCATING MARIJUANA USE

There have only been letters to the editor expressing opposition to
the legalization of hemp, but there should also be a letter
explaining the advantages of legalizing hemp growth in North Dakota.

The main argument that is keeping the crop from being legalized is
that federal law considers hemp the same as marijuana, and by
allowing it, they feel they would be legalizing a drug. While hemp
and marijuana both come from the cannabis plant, they are different
variations of the plant. Hemp contains less than 1 percent THC, and
it is impossible to get a high from it.

In no way does the legalization of hemp growth advocate the growth
or distribution of marijuana.

By allowing farmers to grow the crop, they would provide another
source of income. This would circulate more money into our economy,
which may help with the forecast recession.

Legalizing hemp is also beneficial from an environmental standpoint.

Hemp can be used to make products such as clothes, jewelry, lotion,
chapstick and bread. It provides organic substitutes for things that
otherwise harm our environment. Currently, hemp is more expensive
than those alternatives, but legalizing it would make it more
common and therefore less expensive. This would leave people more
likely to purchase environmentally friendly items.

It is argued that too many people oppose the plan so it will not be
brought to Congress, but many farmers and consumers disagree. Sen.
Kent Conrad stated that he would like to bring it to Congress, but
he does not believe his opinion matters. It does matter because
it is his job to represent the citizens of North Dakota and many of
us think it would be beneficial.

Even if the plan were to be denied, at least we would know that it
was attempted, which is better than not trying at all.

Those who oppose this proposition say hemp should not be allowed
because it resembles marijuana instead of corn or soybeans.

Then maybe we should outlaw Tylenol because it resembles
prescription pills. Better yet, should baking soda be outlawed
because it has the appearance of cocaine?

TIFFANY THRASHER Bismarck