News (Media Awareness Project) - US TN: Editorial: Blackmail Ahead? |
Title: | US TN: Editorial: Blackmail Ahead? |
Published On: | 2004-03-23 |
Source: | Tullahoma News (TN) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-18 13:55:19 |
BLACKMAIL AHEAD?
Some people in Congress are pushing a "zero-tolerance" bill to eliminate
driving under the influence of illegal drugs. State officials are nervous
about the idea, and with good reason.
Unlike alcohol, there is no standard for drugs that defines impairment; in
the eight states that have "drugged driving" laws, standards have been
vague. Nor is there a portable device that would enable police to test
drivers suspected of driving while on drugs.
Rep. Jon Porter, R-Nev., who introduced the bill, wants to offer
cooperating states incentives - money to train police and prosecutors and
to counsel drivers. Other members of Congress who - true to form - want to
punish states that balk are ignoring sensible appeals from the Governors
Highway Safety Association to postpone action.
We believe current laws, which can charge a person with "driving under the
influence" whatever the substance, are adequate. But don't be surprised if
Congress gives in to its perennial impulse to blackmail states into
complying with its will.
- - Reprinted from The Canton (Ohio) Repository
Some people in Congress are pushing a "zero-tolerance" bill to eliminate
driving under the influence of illegal drugs. State officials are nervous
about the idea, and with good reason.
Unlike alcohol, there is no standard for drugs that defines impairment; in
the eight states that have "drugged driving" laws, standards have been
vague. Nor is there a portable device that would enable police to test
drivers suspected of driving while on drugs.
Rep. Jon Porter, R-Nev., who introduced the bill, wants to offer
cooperating states incentives - money to train police and prosecutors and
to counsel drivers. Other members of Congress who - true to form - want to
punish states that balk are ignoring sensible appeals from the Governors
Highway Safety Association to postpone action.
We believe current laws, which can charge a person with "driving under the
influence" whatever the substance, are adequate. But don't be surprised if
Congress gives in to its perennial impulse to blackmail states into
complying with its will.
- - Reprinted from The Canton (Ohio) Repository
Member Comments |
No member comments available...