News (Media Awareness Project) - US OH: Editorial: No More Troops in Colombia |
Title: | US OH: Editorial: No More Troops in Colombia |
Published On: | 2004-03-30 |
Source: | Blade, The (Toledo, OH) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-18 13:34:34 |
NO MORE TROOPS IN COLOMBIA
COLOMBIA President Alvaro Uribe's visit to Washington generated some
progress in U.S.-Colombian efforts to reduce coca production, a key
component in reducing illegal drug shipments to this country. But the
good news also came with a catch: Mr. Uribe's plea for a doubling of
the congressionally mandated cap on the number of U.S. soldiers
stationed there.
That level now stands at 400; authorized military personnel would
increase to 800, with an additional 600 civilian contractors assigned
as well, if Mr. Uribe gets his way.
The United States should just say no.
Colombia is the third largest recipient in the world of American aid,
after Israel and Egypt, not counting Iraq and Afghanistan, receiving
$10 million per week for a total so far of $2.5 billion in military
training and equipment, including helicopters.
Coca production in Colombia is reported to have dropped for the past
two years, showing a decline of an estimated 21 percent in 2003,
according to the CIA.
That's certainly encouraging. The tricky part, however, is that Mr.
Uribe's government in Colombia also uses American military aid
provided for the narcotics program to combat insurgent forces of the
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia.
FARC is a movement that is a combination of Marxists and plain old
bandits and drug dealers who have been fighting the Colombia
government for 40 years now. Mr. Uribe's predecessor as president,
Andres Pastrana, sought to end the conflict with FARC through
negotiations.
That didn't work. Mr. Uribe, by contrast, with American military
support, is seeking to end the rebellion by defeating FARC's forces.
Deepening U.S. involvement in what is clearly a civil war in Colombia
by sending more American soldiers does not make sense.
The Colombian civil war should be resolved by negotiations, not by
what is certainly a bloody and probably unsuccessful effort by Mr.
Uribe's government to end it by force.
The United States should not be using more of our soldiers - stretched
thin already by the commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan - to try to
settle by violence a long-standing internal war in a Latin American
country.
If the administration favors Mr. Uribe's request for more U.S. troops,
Congress should reject it firmly, rather than take America further
down what in all likelihood would be a long and winding road without
end.
COLOMBIA President Alvaro Uribe's visit to Washington generated some
progress in U.S.-Colombian efforts to reduce coca production, a key
component in reducing illegal drug shipments to this country. But the
good news also came with a catch: Mr. Uribe's plea for a doubling of
the congressionally mandated cap on the number of U.S. soldiers
stationed there.
That level now stands at 400; authorized military personnel would
increase to 800, with an additional 600 civilian contractors assigned
as well, if Mr. Uribe gets his way.
The United States should just say no.
Colombia is the third largest recipient in the world of American aid,
after Israel and Egypt, not counting Iraq and Afghanistan, receiving
$10 million per week for a total so far of $2.5 billion in military
training and equipment, including helicopters.
Coca production in Colombia is reported to have dropped for the past
two years, showing a decline of an estimated 21 percent in 2003,
according to the CIA.
That's certainly encouraging. The tricky part, however, is that Mr.
Uribe's government in Colombia also uses American military aid
provided for the narcotics program to combat insurgent forces of the
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia.
FARC is a movement that is a combination of Marxists and plain old
bandits and drug dealers who have been fighting the Colombia
government for 40 years now. Mr. Uribe's predecessor as president,
Andres Pastrana, sought to end the conflict with FARC through
negotiations.
That didn't work. Mr. Uribe, by contrast, with American military
support, is seeking to end the rebellion by defeating FARC's forces.
Deepening U.S. involvement in what is clearly a civil war in Colombia
by sending more American soldiers does not make sense.
The Colombian civil war should be resolved by negotiations, not by
what is certainly a bloody and probably unsuccessful effort by Mr.
Uribe's government to end it by force.
The United States should not be using more of our soldiers - stretched
thin already by the commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan - to try to
settle by violence a long-standing internal war in a Latin American
country.
If the administration favors Mr. Uribe's request for more U.S. troops,
Congress should reject it firmly, rather than take America further
down what in all likelihood would be a long and winding road without
end.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...