News (Media Awareness Project) - US NC: Edu: PUB LTE: Hemp, Marijuana Should Be Legalized |
Title: | US NC: Edu: PUB LTE: Hemp, Marijuana Should Be Legalized |
Published On: | 2004-04-15 |
Source: | Pendulum, The (NC Edu Elon University) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-18 12:31:41 |
HEMP, MARIJUANA SHOULD BE LEGALIZED
To the Editor:
Regarding Adam Klein's April 8 column ("Hemp, the perfect paper
substitute"), the United States is one of the few countries in the world
that deny farmers the right to grow industrial hemp. Apparently government
bureaucrats in Washington can't tell the difference between a tall hemp
stalk and a short marijuana bush.
Prior to the passage of the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937, few Americans had
heard of marijuana, despite widespread cultivation of its non-intoxicating
cousin, industrial hemp.
The first marijuana laws were enacted in response to Mexican migration
during the early 1900s, despite opposition from the American Medical
Association.
White Americans did not even begin to smoke marijuana until a soon-to-be
entrenched government bureaucracy began funding reefer madness propaganda.
Dire warnings that marijuana inspires homicidal rages have been
counterproductive at best.
According to a 2002 Time/CNN poll, 47 percent of Americans have smoked pot.
The reefer madness myths have long been discredited, forcing the drug war
gravy train to spend millions of tax dollars on politicized research,
trying to find harm in a relatively harmless plant.
The direct experience of millions of Americans contradicts the
sensationalistic myths used to justify marijuana prohibition. Illegal drug
use is the only public health issue wherein key stakeholders are not only
ignored, but actively persecuted and incarcerated. In terms of medical
marijuana, those stakeholders happen to be cancer and AIDS patients.
Reefer madness is a poor excuse for incarcerating Americans who prefer
marijuana to martinis. There is no excuse for denying farmers the right to
grow industrial hemp.
Students who want to help end the intergenerational culture war, otherwise
known as the war on some drugs, should contact Students for Sensible Drug
Policy at www.ssdp.org.
Robert Sharpe, Policy Analyst
Common Sense for Drug Policy
To the Editor:
Regarding Adam Klein's April 8 column ("Hemp, the perfect paper
substitute"), the United States is one of the few countries in the world
that deny farmers the right to grow industrial hemp. Apparently government
bureaucrats in Washington can't tell the difference between a tall hemp
stalk and a short marijuana bush.
Prior to the passage of the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937, few Americans had
heard of marijuana, despite widespread cultivation of its non-intoxicating
cousin, industrial hemp.
The first marijuana laws were enacted in response to Mexican migration
during the early 1900s, despite opposition from the American Medical
Association.
White Americans did not even begin to smoke marijuana until a soon-to-be
entrenched government bureaucracy began funding reefer madness propaganda.
Dire warnings that marijuana inspires homicidal rages have been
counterproductive at best.
According to a 2002 Time/CNN poll, 47 percent of Americans have smoked pot.
The reefer madness myths have long been discredited, forcing the drug war
gravy train to spend millions of tax dollars on politicized research,
trying to find harm in a relatively harmless plant.
The direct experience of millions of Americans contradicts the
sensationalistic myths used to justify marijuana prohibition. Illegal drug
use is the only public health issue wherein key stakeholders are not only
ignored, but actively persecuted and incarcerated. In terms of medical
marijuana, those stakeholders happen to be cancer and AIDS patients.
Reefer madness is a poor excuse for incarcerating Americans who prefer
marijuana to martinis. There is no excuse for denying farmers the right to
grow industrial hemp.
Students who want to help end the intergenerational culture war, otherwise
known as the war on some drugs, should contact Students for Sensible Drug
Policy at www.ssdp.org.
Robert Sharpe, Policy Analyst
Common Sense for Drug Policy
Member Comments |
No member comments available...