News (Media Awareness Project) - CN ON: Proposed Law Would Crack Down On Drivers Stoned Behind |
Title: | CN ON: Proposed Law Would Crack Down On Drivers Stoned Behind |
Published On: | 2004-04-30 |
Source: | Mississauga News (CN ON) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-18 11:01:56 |
PROPOSED LAW WOULD CRACK DOWN ON DRIVERS STONED BEHIND WHEEL
Mississauga motorists who toke and drive will no longer walk away clean
under a proposed plan that gives Peel Regional Police the power to demand
saliva, blood and urine from drivers whom they suspect are high on drugs.
The proposed changes to the Criminal Code, introduced this week by the
federal Liberals, are being welcomed by Peel traffic officers and officials
with Mississauga-based Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD).
"We are very pleased that the government is finally listening," said Andrew
Murie, MADD's national executive director. "Police simply have no powers to
send the message out that drugs and driving don't mix."
Although it's a criminal offence to drive while impaired on drugs or
alcohol -- with penalties running to life imprisonment in the case where
the offence causes a death -- the police don't have the authority to test a
driver for drugs and obtain evidence for a prosecution. While there is a
standard procedure to administer a breathalyzer when drinking and driving
is suspected, it's much harder for police to prove a driver is impaired by
drug use.
Currently, there are just a handful of drug-related impaired driving cases
before the courts in Peel, police said.
Peel police say they have been forced to let suspected impaired drivers go,
even when they appear to be high on drugs, because police weren't empowered
to collect enough proof of impairment.
"The laws are limited as to what we can do (when police suspect impairment
through drugs)," said Peel Inspector Norm English, head of Traffic
Services. "Any assistance that could help us deal with it or eliminate it
is beneficial."
Under the new bill, a police officer could, on reasonable suspicion that a
driver is drug-impaired, require a road-side physical sobriety test.
If a driver fails, the officer at the scene could demand more extensive
testing at the police station by an officer specially trained in drug
recognition (DRE).
The DRE officer would demand a sample of a bodily fluid for testing.
Failure to provide a sample on demand would be a criminal offence -- a fine
of $600 for the first offence.
Murie said MADD and police are grateful the legislation is being introduced
at the same time the government is expected to pass a controversial bill to
decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana.
Mississauga motorists who toke and drive will no longer walk away clean
under a proposed plan that gives Peel Regional Police the power to demand
saliva, blood and urine from drivers whom they suspect are high on drugs.
The proposed changes to the Criminal Code, introduced this week by the
federal Liberals, are being welcomed by Peel traffic officers and officials
with Mississauga-based Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD).
"We are very pleased that the government is finally listening," said Andrew
Murie, MADD's national executive director. "Police simply have no powers to
send the message out that drugs and driving don't mix."
Although it's a criminal offence to drive while impaired on drugs or
alcohol -- with penalties running to life imprisonment in the case where
the offence causes a death -- the police don't have the authority to test a
driver for drugs and obtain evidence for a prosecution. While there is a
standard procedure to administer a breathalyzer when drinking and driving
is suspected, it's much harder for police to prove a driver is impaired by
drug use.
Currently, there are just a handful of drug-related impaired driving cases
before the courts in Peel, police said.
Peel police say they have been forced to let suspected impaired drivers go,
even when they appear to be high on drugs, because police weren't empowered
to collect enough proof of impairment.
"The laws are limited as to what we can do (when police suspect impairment
through drugs)," said Peel Inspector Norm English, head of Traffic
Services. "Any assistance that could help us deal with it or eliminate it
is beneficial."
Under the new bill, a police officer could, on reasonable suspicion that a
driver is drug-impaired, require a road-side physical sobriety test.
If a driver fails, the officer at the scene could demand more extensive
testing at the police station by an officer specially trained in drug
recognition (DRE).
The DRE officer would demand a sample of a bodily fluid for testing.
Failure to provide a sample on demand would be a criminal offence -- a fine
of $600 for the first offence.
Murie said MADD and police are grateful the legislation is being introduced
at the same time the government is expected to pass a controversial bill to
decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...