Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US NC: Drug-Search Law Worries Some Officers
Title:US NC: Drug-Search Law Worries Some Officers
Published On:2004-07-06
Source:Winston-Salem Journal (NC)
Fetched On:2008-01-18 06:13:01
DRUG-SEARCH LAW WORRIES SOME OFFICERS

Private Dog Handlers Will Be Able To Sniff Out Drugs For Businesses

FAYETTEVILLE -- Some North Carolina police officers say they're concerned
about a new state law that allows private dog handlers to conduct drug
searches for businesses.

The law, which the legislature approved last year and takes effect in
October, lets private dog handlers register with the state and establish a
commercial detection service.

Supporters of the new law say that the private services can help employers
maintain a drug-free workplace, but critics say that only sworn officers
should be allowed to search for drugs because of legal issues.

"This is a bad idea," said Eldon Presnell, the president of the United
States Canine Association for North and South Carolina. Presnell, a dog
handler with the Greensboro Police Department, said that his association
wants the law repealed.

Police are concerned, Presnell said, because the law was designed for
people other than law-enforcement officers and could jeopardize the chain
of custody by eliminating police from drug searches.

State officials have been developing requirements for private dog handlers.
Proposed rules require those who apply to be dog handlers to show that they
are competent in drug-detection training and handling, including basic
obedience, dog safety, and the legality of searches and identifying illegal
drugs.

The handlers must be certified by a state-approved association and
registered with the Drug Enforcement Administration. Criminal-background
and fingerprint checks will be done. The applicant must also register to
handle drugs for training.

Richard Rogers, a retired police officer and a police-dog trainer who lives
in Harnett County, said that the law could infringe on people's rights.

Police must have probable cause to conduct searches, but the law would let
private companies and individuals to do what officers could not.

"We have got to adhere to the Fourth Amendment," said Sgt. Tim Loughman of
the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office police-dog unit. "There are certain
things that we as police officers must obey."

Loughman said that some dog-training associations will certify handlers
only if they are police officers. He said that dog handlers must understand
the details of search and seizure to eliminate problems if a case goes to
court.

Other officers have taken a neutral stance.

"I don't know whether it will be good or not," said Herman Dunn, an
investigator and dog handler for the Bladen County Sheriff's Office. "I
guess we would have to see after a trial how it would go."
Member Comments
No member comments available...