Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - Canada: OPED: The Great Thai Media Muzzler
Title:Canada: OPED: The Great Thai Media Muzzler
Published On:2004-07-19
Source:Globe and Mail (Canada)
Fetched On:2008-01-18 05:02:39
THE GREAT THAI MEDIA MUZZLER

The PM's Disdain For Any Criticism Of His Autocratic Rule Is Bad For
Human Rights And Dangerous For Thailand

Thailand's Thaksin Shinawatra, a media mogul turned Prime Minister
who's brought a tough-guy stance and right-of-centre politics to
government, has often been characterized as an Asian version of
Italy's Silvio Berlusconi. But, increasingly, Thais are invoking the
name of an earlier, more infamous, Italian political figure in comparison.

Mr. Thaksin is no Mussolini, but his disdain for any criticism of his
increasingly autocratic rule has clearly reversed some of Thailand's
recent advances in human rights. Freedom of expression has suffered; a
brutal campaign of extrajudicial executions seems to be taking place
under the guise of a war on drugs; and significant social policies,
such as the responses to the bird-flu outbreak and the spread of AIDS,
are accepted without debate and implemented without monitoring.

Partly in recognition of this state of affairs, the Canadian HIV/AIDS
Legal Network and Human Rights Watch have just conferred their annual
global award to the Thai Drug Users' Network, which has worked to stem
the spread of AIDS and protect the human rights of drug users
undermined by Mr. Thaksin's lethal war on drugs.

Mr. Thaksin owns or has major stakes in many of Thailand's media
outlets. But since his Thai Rak Thai (Thais Love Thais) party swept to
power in 2001, his administration and personal financial empire have
stifled Thailand's media and tried to project an unchallenged image of
a no-nonsense, can-do government firmly in charge of a tranquil
country. Within this context, media coverage of Mr. Thaksin's
picture-perfect Thailand has had to conceal many serious reports of
state-sponsored human-rights abuses.

Mr. Thaksin once told the Thai press corps, "Serving the country is
more important than sending your news dispatches daily to your
editors. Think before you do anything that damages the country."

According to the Thai Journalists Association and the Thai
Broadcasters Association, more than 20 news editors have been
dismissed, transferred or had their work tampered with to appease the
government. In almost all the cases, managers of the media outlets
chose to refrain from publicizing the government's pressure or
criticizing its interference.

On taking office, for instance, Mr. Thaksin declared the suppression
of methamphetamines to be at the top of his administration's agenda.
To deliver on this promise, he launched, in February of 2003, a
nationwide anti-drug campaign that quickly degenerated into a
murderous war on drug dealers or users.

Within three months, nearly 2,500 people were killed; the government
claimed that most died as a result of gang rivalry, but many were
killed when they left police stations.

The Thai media have not vigorously investigated this outbreak of
violence. Instead, the climate of fear and the practice of
self-censorship have transformed the media into government
cheerleaders. Amid widespread allegations that extrajudicial
executions are officially approved in Thailand, a survey administered
by the Ministry of Information and Communications Technology last
August showed that 78 per cent of Thais expressed extreme satisfaction
with the government's war on drugs.

As a result of muzzling the press, Mr. Thaksin has stifled some very
necessary social debate. The outbreak of bird flu earlier this year
once again highlighted government interference in the media, both
through direct ownership and through pressure and manipulation of
media owners.

At one of Thailand's largest English-language newspapers, the Bangkok
Post, Veera Prateepchaikul was reportedly removed from his post as
editor to stifle the paper's criticisms of Mr. Thaksin and his
government's mishandling of the bird-flu crisis. The news editor of
iTV, which is 50 per cent owned by the Prime Minister's business
empire, was also removed after the station broadcast a story critical
of the government. The editor of Siamrath Weekly was pressed to resign
after the newsmagazine's critical views on this issue.

Although the suppression of media coverage of the bird-flu outbreak
revealed a systematic cover-up, the facts about the outbreak have
never been fully disclosed. There has been no accountability from the
government for the deaths of at least eight Thais, or for the near
collapse of Thailand's poultry industry. The outbreak could have been
more effectively contained if the media had been allowed to function
independently and the public given better access to
information.

The manipulation of the media also has undermined Thailand's fight
against HIV/AIDS, one area where, until recently, the country could
claim status as a model of successful social policy.

In the past, health experts praised Thailand's leadership against AIDS
as a result of the country's successful "100-per-cent condom" campaign
in the 1990s. That program prevented an estimated 200,000 HIV
infections by providing condoms and HIV/AIDS information in brothels
and health clinics. But Mr. Thaksin's war on drugs has reversed many
of those gains.

In a 60-page report released before last week's International AIDS
Conference in Bangkok, Human Rights Watch documented that although
dealers are the stated targets of the war on drugs, users not charged
with dealing have been persecuted and driven into hiding; that, of
course, prevents them from reaching needle-exchange programs and other
HIV-prevention services. Many injection-drug users face the risk of
HIV infection from the sharing of blood-contaminated syringes.

When Mr. Thaksin recently said that the Thai government no longer
treats drug users as criminals but as patients, he was challenged by a
protester holding a sign reading, "Thai Government's Drug Policy
Drop Dead."

It is a simple message, and maybe even simplistic. But Mr. Thaksin has
limited the arena for public debate to the extent that key social
policies can only be challenged by those holding placards. There are
real problems associated with the Prime Minister's harsh tactics.
Ignoring them is bad for human rights and dangerous for Thailand.
Member Comments
No member comments available...