BC MARIJUANA APPROACH OUTDATED

B.C.'s approach to marijuana makes about as much sense as America's great
Prohibition experiment in the '20s.

In both cases, the governments took aim at substances which are widely
accepted. And in both cases, they decided that the way to achieve the goal
was to wipe out the supply.

It's a doomed approach, as Prohibition established. The only big winners are
serious criminals.

StatsCan has just released a new survey on drug use, which found that 16 per
cent of British Columbians 15 and over had used marijuana in 2002. That's
about 525,000 people, not nearly as many who knocked back a few beer on a
Friday night but still an awful lot of people to portray as criminals.

Among younger British Columbians marijuana use is even more prevalent.
Across Canada, more than one-third of people between 15 and 24 have used
marijuana in the last 12 months. The data suggests the percentage is about
45 per cent in B.C.

You can't arrest half-a-million people.

So Solicitor General Rich Coleman is advocating more enforcement, and
tougher penalties, for the people who supply marijuana. He said the StatsCan
results showed the need for the courts to get tough with people who run grow
ops.

It's a doomed approach, like Prohibition.

Economic laws are just as powerful as the ones passed by politicians. When
enough Americans wanted a drink after work, suppliers - from Al Capone to
neighborhood bootleggers - emerged to meet the demand. When millions of
Canadians have decided they want to smoke pot from time to time, then
suppliers will emerge. That's the way markets work.

When demand is huge, attacking the supply side won't work. Too many people
want to buy and the rewards are too great. And the public is not going to
accept harsher and harsher penalties for the people growing the marijuana
that one in six of them consume.

B.C. has tried. Despite the relaxed reputation, police lay a lot of charges.
The StatsCan study found the rate of pot use in B.C. was about 25 per cent
higher than the national average, the rate at which charges were laid was 75
per cent higher.

It hasn't worked, prompting calls for tougher penalties.

But look south of the border, where the war on drugs has been fought by
locking up people.

Fewer than one in five people convicted in B.C. for running a grow op do
jail time. In Washington State, almost half those convicted get a jail term
of five years or more, Coleman says.

But the only result has been crowded jails. Marijuana is still readily
available, and widely used. And despite concern about imports from Canada,
most U.S. marijuana is grown domestically.

The B.C. government's stated concern is organized crime, and it's logical
that any illegal activity with big cash profits is going to attract serious
criminals.

But the current strategy isn't working. It's not reducing use, or the role
of organized gangs.

That doesn't mean government has to give up. But it needs a new approach.

One obvious answer is to shift resources from indiscriminately busting grow
ops to focusing specifically on organized crime. The Organized Crime Agency
of BC - now rolled into the RCMP - complained that a budget freeze left it
unable to do its job. That hardly fights with a commitment to tackling the
problem.

Another is an education campaign on all drugs, from alcohol to heroin, aimed
at young users. Many aren't going to stop using, but with good information
they can make much more sensible choices.

And another is to simply be more creative. If the aim is to rob organized
crime of marijuana profits, then an easy answer is to turn a blind eye to
people growing a dozen plants. Supply increases, prices fall and there's no
role for the gangs. (An obvious, more complicated solution would be to
legalize marijuana, placing it under government regulation.)

The choices are complicated. But one thing is clear - what we're doing now
isn't working.