News (Media Awareness Project) - US TN: Writer Speaks On Drug Testing |
Title: | US TN: Writer Speaks On Drug Testing |
Published On: | 2004-10-11 |
Source: | Daily Beacon, The (TN Edu) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-17 22:02:55 |
WRITER SPEAKS ON DRUG TESTING
The drug testing industry and with the detoxification industry have
both grown into multi-billion dollar industries since the 1980s with
60 percent of all companies and 40 percent of the Fortune 500 testing
for illegal drugs, a visiting lecturer said Friday.
Kenneth Tunnell of Eastern Kentucky University promoted his new book,
"Pissing on Demand," at a University of Tennesee lecture.
"Companies became convinced that employees who used drugs were costing
them billions in producitivity losses and so they began to test,"
Tunnell said.
The Supreme Court's ruling that drug testing does not violate the
Fourth or Fifth Amendments and Reagan's new "war on drugs," allowed
workplace drug testing to become very common.
Testing grew from less than 10 percent of companies testing in 1983 to
67 percent testing in 1993. With this drug-testing explosion came a
counter industry which seeks to market products for employees to
resist these tests.
He likened these companies to hawkers of radar detectors and
previously written term papers.
"I don't want to romanticize them, but they are a kind of resistance,"
Tunnell said.
With names like "Urine Luck" and the ever-popular "Ready Clean," they
market mostly ingestable products that they claim removes all toxins
from the body. He said that they are mostly diuretics and can be
effective if taken properly with lots of water.
Companies spend an awful lot of money to do drug testing but usually
make it back and then some with all the tax breaks that the government
gives them for doing the testing.
"It seems that companies are not that concerned with their employees'
health but rather concerned with policing, that's why you typically
don't see them testing for asbestos," which can be harmful to
employees' health, Tunnell said.
Policing is exactly what it is, because the tests that the companies
do only reveal drug use that has happened - not that it is happening.
"So what you have got," he said, "is a company knowing you smoked weed
four weeks ago but not what you may or may not have done today,"
Tunnell said. "Not to mention that when they test, they can actually
test for many more drugs such as lithium, prozac or hydrocodone, which
most people would not want their employers knowing they were taking."
Jason Giglio, manager at Calhoun's on the river, said that "testing is
not done unless it's suspected, caught or an injury occurs that
requires medical treatment."
"If we drug tested in this business we'd have no employees," he
said.
The lecture was part of the UT Science Forum which holds a "brown-bag"
lecture most Fridays. The next one will be Oct. 22 in Dining Room C in
Thompson-Boling Arena.
The drug testing industry and with the detoxification industry have
both grown into multi-billion dollar industries since the 1980s with
60 percent of all companies and 40 percent of the Fortune 500 testing
for illegal drugs, a visiting lecturer said Friday.
Kenneth Tunnell of Eastern Kentucky University promoted his new book,
"Pissing on Demand," at a University of Tennesee lecture.
"Companies became convinced that employees who used drugs were costing
them billions in producitivity losses and so they began to test,"
Tunnell said.
The Supreme Court's ruling that drug testing does not violate the
Fourth or Fifth Amendments and Reagan's new "war on drugs," allowed
workplace drug testing to become very common.
Testing grew from less than 10 percent of companies testing in 1983 to
67 percent testing in 1993. With this drug-testing explosion came a
counter industry which seeks to market products for employees to
resist these tests.
He likened these companies to hawkers of radar detectors and
previously written term papers.
"I don't want to romanticize them, but they are a kind of resistance,"
Tunnell said.
With names like "Urine Luck" and the ever-popular "Ready Clean," they
market mostly ingestable products that they claim removes all toxins
from the body. He said that they are mostly diuretics and can be
effective if taken properly with lots of water.
Companies spend an awful lot of money to do drug testing but usually
make it back and then some with all the tax breaks that the government
gives them for doing the testing.
"It seems that companies are not that concerned with their employees'
health but rather concerned with policing, that's why you typically
don't see them testing for asbestos," which can be harmful to
employees' health, Tunnell said.
Policing is exactly what it is, because the tests that the companies
do only reveal drug use that has happened - not that it is happening.
"So what you have got," he said, "is a company knowing you smoked weed
four weeks ago but not what you may or may not have done today,"
Tunnell said. "Not to mention that when they test, they can actually
test for many more drugs such as lithium, prozac or hydrocodone, which
most people would not want their employers knowing they were taking."
Jason Giglio, manager at Calhoun's on the river, said that "testing is
not done unless it's suspected, caught or an injury occurs that
requires medical treatment."
"If we drug tested in this business we'd have no employees," he
said.
The lecture was part of the UT Science Forum which holds a "brown-bag"
lecture most Fridays. The next one will be Oct. 22 in Dining Room C in
Thompson-Boling Arena.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...