Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US VT: State's Program Has Few Takers
Title:US VT: State's Program Has Few Takers
Published On:2004-11-30
Source:Brattleboro Reformer (VT)
Fetched On:2008-01-17 08:25:13
STATE'S PROGRAM HAS FEW TAKERS

BRATTLEBORO -- As the Supreme Court considers whether to allow states
to enact laws governing the usage of federally banned drugs, Vermont
officials are still waiting to receive their first application for the
permitted use of marijuana.

Last month, the state Department of Public Safety began accepting
applications for people suffering from certain serious diseases to be
placed on a newly created marijuana registry.

"The state of Vermont took a unique approach in trying to meet
everybody's needs," said Francis Aumand III, director of the
department's Criminal Justice Services. "They made this a a regulatory
function rather than a health department function."

But since that time, Aumand said none of the 43 applications requested
have been returned. More could be circulating, he said, because
applications are posted on the department's Web site.

"Nobody has finished processing the applications or have mailed them
back yet," he said.

In May, the Vermont Legislature joined Maine as the only two states in
the Northeast with laws protecting the usage of marijuana by seriously
ill patients.

Without the signature of Gov. James Douglas, the Vermont legislation
created the registry allowing the use of marijuana among patients in
end-of-life care or suffering the effects of cancer and AIDS.

Also eligible for the registry are those patients suffering from
cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, or positive status for human
immunodeficiency virus, who have debilitating symptoms not relieved by
conventional treatment.

In addition to the application, prospective applicants must provide a
digital photograph, physician verification of the medical condition
suffered and a $100 administration fee. Qualified patients are then
given a unique identification number and card, which can easily be
verified by any law enforcement agent across the state.

But with the issue being heard Monday in the nation's highest court
with a ruling due sometime next year, Aumand said it would be
difficult to tell how a ruling banning medical marijuana usage would
affect Vermont.

From the department's perspective, he said the marijuana registry
would likely be put on hold until legislators could talk with legal
counsel.

"It would undoubtedly be addressed by our Legislature," he
said.

Max Schlueter, the director of the Vermont Criminal Information
Center, speculated that a Supreme Court ruling against states' rights
to make laws governing medical marijuana usage wouldn't change much in
Vermont.

"When the Legislature passed this law, that was the status quo," he
said. "It's not like the Legislature passed this without knowing the
federal implications."

Even if Vermonters eventually join the marijuana registry, Schlueter
said the state law wouldn't absolve them from federal prosecution. If
the government performed raids, he said citizens on the registry would
be just as culpable as if they were not.

"They're not exempt under federal law because they're in violation of
the federal drug act," he said. "The question is, of course, what is
the likelihood that there would be a federal prosecution on this activity."

In Vermont, that likelihood is fairly infinitesimal, said Bruce
Mirken, a spokesman for the Washington D.C.-based Marijuana Policy
Project which has spent $426,349 lobbying in Vermont since 2002. He
said nearly 99 percent of marijuana arrests in the state are made by
local and state law enforcement agencies.

"It isn't perfect, but still substantial," he said. "[The law] is
still going to be in place no matter what happens."

Mirken said a federal court ruling in favor of medicinal marijuana
usage would finally offer complete protection to those Vermonters
permitted to use the drug. This change, he said, will likely happen
over time, given the increasing support for such uses by the populous.

"But it's not going to happen next week."
Member Comments
No member comments available...