Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US MO: Edu: Presentation Addresses Marijuana Law Confusion
Title:US MO: Edu: Presentation Addresses Marijuana Law Confusion
Published On:2004-12-03
Source:Maneater, The (Columbia, MO Edu)
Fetched On:2008-01-17 07:54:01
PRESENTATION ADDRESSES MARIJUANA LAW CONFUSION

Added confusion about Columbia's recently altered marijuana laws has
added significance to a presentation encouraging students to know
their legal rights.

The MU chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of
Marijuana Laws held its annual "Know Your Rights" presentation
Thursday night, only a month after Propositions 1 and 2 passed.

Proposition 1 allows the use of medical marijuana for seriously ill
patients who have consent from a doctor. Proposition 2 directs
misdemeanor marijuana possession charges to municipal court, allowing
students convicted of these charges to retain eligibility for
financial aid.

MU NORML President Amanda Broz said NORML and Students for Sensible
Drug Laws hold similar presentations every year to help inform
students of their rights at traffic stops or other encounters with
local law enforcement. Broz said because of the passage of the new
propositions and the ensuing confusion about which law enforcement
agencies in Columbia are following the new ordinances, more students
would likely take interest this year.

"I expected more questions tonight because of the new propositions,"
Broz said. "People wonder if it gives you more leniency and where it
is applicable."

The presentation featured Columbia attorney Anthony Phillips, who
discussed general rules for dealing with law enforcement. Phillips
explained why local law enforcement agencies were or were not
following the ordinance and what that meant for people who were arrested.

"It's important for people to be educated on their constitutional
rights and assert their constitutional rights in appropriate
situations," Phillips said. "We live in a country founded on freedom,
and we have to protect that."

Phillips cautioned students that the MU Police Department was only
following the proposition in cases of first-time offenders and would
send subsequent offenders to county court.

Concerns were raised at the meeting about MUPD's jurisdiction and the
possibility of the Columbia Police Department calling MUPD to assist
in marijuana arrests, since MUPD is not bound by Proposition 2.

However, both Dan Viets, a Columbia attorney and Missouri NORML
coordinator, and Columbia Police Sgt. Danny Grant said local police
are making a genuine effort to enforce the law.

"People have brought up this clever little idea that CPD can just call
another agency and have them arrest people, and then send them to
state court," Viets said. "But that is not happening. The police chief
has said 'We will absolutely not do that.'"

Grant explained that MUPD and the Columbia Police Department assist
each other in arrests regularly, especially in areas close to campus.
However, Grant said even if MUPD assisted on an arrest off campus,
Columbia police would ultimately make the arrest, meaning Proposition
2 would apply.

Grant also said MU police officers are justified in making arrests off
campus, but they don't intentionally venture far from campus to make
arrests.

Viets said roughly 80 percent of misdemeanor marijuana arrests in city
limits were made by Columbia police and added that few second-time
marijuana arrests are made by MUPD.

"As far as those other agencies, I do not accept that they are not
obligated to follow the ordinance," Viets said. "That still remains to
be seen."
Member Comments
No member comments available...