CUT HARD TIME

Rehab Can Do More Than Cut Costs

James McDonough is one of the longest serving top state officials in
Florida, having been the so-called Drug Czar for most of the Jeb Bush
administration and now serving as secretary of the Department of
Corrections under Gov. Crist.

He is also a man who has the wisdom and the gumption to try to lead
the leaders, coming up with proposals such as this week's suggestion
that his agency can save 10 percent by moving thousands of state
inmates from prisons to work release, substance abuse and education programs.

The savings he projects would be twice what Mr. Crist has asked of
the agency, but it isn't an easy proposal to swallow politically,
however wise and far-sighted if managed with scrupulous regard for
public safety.

Mr. McDonough wants to use the approach, releasing non-sex offenders
- - with no escape history or domestic violence injunctions - three
months early, to better prepare inmates to make a successful
transition back into society. Right now about a third of inmates
released from DOC, return, so the current system isn't exactly
working when it comes to recidivism.

In a report Saturday in the Sarasota Herald Tribune, Mr. McDonough
said he realized this would be a shift from more than a decade of
hard-line policies - including those emanating from the governor's
own "chain-gang Charlie" years. In the 1990s, then-state senator
Crist lead lawmakers in mandating that all inmates serve 85 percent
of their sentence, and promoted work on roadside labor crews.

But the governor said last week that he respects Mr. McDonough's
"excellent judgment" and would like to see what offenders would be
under consideration, and whether they would indeed pose little threat
to the public.

This is an open-minded view not reflected in the Senate where
criminal justice committee chairman Victor Crist (no relation to the
governor) reacted more negatively.

It is indeed a concept to be considered very carefully, but clearly
the need to make dire cuts in the budget is an incentive and
opportunity to review any programs that may represent excessive
loyalty to a political selling point, but cannot necessarily be supported.

For example, some 3,000 inmates who, nearing the end of their
sentences, have already been out working in the public for sometime
yet are staying in DOC institutions at night. Mr. McDonough, a former
West Point-educated Army officer, said there is little risk in
releasing these inmates to work-release centers, which still provide
oversight, drug testing, garnished wages and so forth.

Another 3,600 inmates are coming from local communities that have
sentenced them to a year and a day - just long enough to place them
in a state prison instead of in an overcrowded local jail. Mr.
McDonough contends many of these would be more effectively managed in
halfway houses or substance abuse treatment centers instead of
expensive state prisons, an approach that would promote a better
transition for these short-sentence inmates back into society.

Given the state budget crunch, and the fact that the budget
population has doubled since 1990 in large part due to laws that put
long-term incarceration above vocational, education and mental health
treatment - a review of programs that aren't truly effective but are
excessively expensive is a prudent, probably necessary, and even
professionally smart step to take.