News (Media Awareness Project) - CN AB: Column: Drug Prohibition Doesn't Work |
| Title: | CN AB: Column: Drug Prohibition Doesn't Work |
| Published On: | 2007-08-28 |
| Source: | Calgary Sun, The (CN AB) |
| Fetched On: | 2008-01-11 23:31:40 |
DRUG PROHIBITION DOESN'T WORK
Welcome to the new war on drugs, same as the old war, and courtesy of
Canada's federal government.
Like an old dog who can't learn new tricks, the Harper government
seems bent on preserving the tired, utterly disproven message that
drug prohibition works.
Of course, it doesn't, despite Health Minister Tony Clement's speech
last week to the Canadian Medical Association.
There is an overwhelming abundance of proof that prohibitions against
illegal drugs simply create a massive marketplace for criminals and
narco-economically driven nations, as well as some demons that are
convenient at police and government budget appropriation time.
They don't stop people from getting or using drugs.
Period.
There are dozens of studies showing that marijuana is physically and
mentally bad for you, yes.
But there are also many that prove that prohibition is bad for all of
us.
Even if you think using drugs is immoral, continuing to ban them just
props up organized crime through the massive profits that a black
market can create.
And that's despite the fact that, at most, about 4% of the population
uses them.
Less than 2% of the population has a problem stemming from a hard drug
like cocaine or heroin.
Harm reduction -- the acceptance that we should minimize risk to users
because nothing will stop them from using -- does work and can
drastically reduce the social consequences of illegal drug use:
Overdoses, junkie crime and the spread of diseases.
From studies showing an elimination of overdoses of heroin among lower
east side Vancouver users of a safe injection site, to a 500-page-plus
amalgamation of earlier studies by the Canadian senate on the impacts
of weed, to the failure of the U.S. liquor prohibition in the 1920s,
there is simply nothing factual -- nothing -- that governments seem
able to offer to counter a century of failed prohibition.
That our government seems bent on ignoring evidence and public opinion
in favour of imposing rigid, ineffective ideology that damages society
begs the question: What are these guys smoking?
Welcome to the new war on drugs, same as the old war, and courtesy of
Canada's federal government.
Like an old dog who can't learn new tricks, the Harper government
seems bent on preserving the tired, utterly disproven message that
drug prohibition works.
Of course, it doesn't, despite Health Minister Tony Clement's speech
last week to the Canadian Medical Association.
There is an overwhelming abundance of proof that prohibitions against
illegal drugs simply create a massive marketplace for criminals and
narco-economically driven nations, as well as some demons that are
convenient at police and government budget appropriation time.
They don't stop people from getting or using drugs.
Period.
There are dozens of studies showing that marijuana is physically and
mentally bad for you, yes.
But there are also many that prove that prohibition is bad for all of
us.
Even if you think using drugs is immoral, continuing to ban them just
props up organized crime through the massive profits that a black
market can create.
And that's despite the fact that, at most, about 4% of the population
uses them.
Less than 2% of the population has a problem stemming from a hard drug
like cocaine or heroin.
Harm reduction -- the acceptance that we should minimize risk to users
because nothing will stop them from using -- does work and can
drastically reduce the social consequences of illegal drug use:
Overdoses, junkie crime and the spread of diseases.
From studies showing an elimination of overdoses of heroin among lower
east side Vancouver users of a safe injection site, to a 500-page-plus
amalgamation of earlier studies by the Canadian senate on the impacts
of weed, to the failure of the U.S. liquor prohibition in the 1920s,
there is simply nothing factual -- nothing -- that governments seem
able to offer to counter a century of failed prohibition.
That our government seems bent on ignoring evidence and public opinion
in favour of imposing rigid, ineffective ideology that damages society
begs the question: What are these guys smoking?
Member Comments |
No member comments available...
