News (Media Awareness Project) - US MA: PUB LTE: Misuse Of School Zone Law |
Title: | US MA: PUB LTE: Misuse Of School Zone Law |
Published On: | 2005-05-18 |
Source: | Berkshire Eagle, The (Pittsfield, MA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-16 12:52:59 |
MISUSE OF SCHOOL ZONE LAW
To the Editor of THE EAGLE:
Dealing drugs in or near schools in intolerable, and the fools who do it
should eat the severe consequences that the law calls for. However, if
someone asked me where the school zones are, I would probably say that they
are where the schools are. That seems like a no-brainer, but apparently it
isn't. I never would have guessed that the parking lot where the Great
Barrington youth allegedly performed their bad acts is in a school zone.
Where's the school?
Apparently there's a bona-fide school in some rooms very close by. Who
knew? This is not a trivial point.
To the contrary, it's central to whether or not justice is being done, and
if the law is actually being applied as intended.
If the successful sting operation had been conducted a couple of blocks
elsewhere, the first-time offenders would apparently be looking at a range
of serious consequences short of jail time. That seems reasonable. If they
stay out of trouble, the taxpayers save a lot of money and the offenders
can return to learning how to be constructive citizens.
If they continue to screw up, then the consequences escalate until
incarceration becomes the best remedy. As the situation now stands, it
seems like our DA is painted into a corner, or at least is afraid to
venture out of the corner.
Poor and distorted public policy is the result.
Arbitrarily sending the first-timers to the slammer for two years is
excessively punitive and expensive, not to mention counterproductive. After
all, jails are not noted for being incubators for tomorrow's finest. That's
why incarceration is, by design, generally not applied against
first-timers, especially youthful ones, under the circumstances. It's poor
logic to claim that incarcerating these first-timers for two years is equal
justice, when most first-timers are not incarcerated. The law and order
constituency, which I actually belong to, is misguided this time. If we
step back and objectively evaluate what's going on here, we will all see
that what's out of order is the way this situation is being handled. The
school zone law needs to be amended so that it will be confined to only
achieving what it was designed for, which is to keep drugs away from
schools by making it extremely painful to do otherwise, and that's a good
policy.
But the situation at hand seems to be a horse of another color, maybe even
curious colors.
JEFFREY H. HERMAN
West Stockbridge
To the Editor of THE EAGLE:
Dealing drugs in or near schools in intolerable, and the fools who do it
should eat the severe consequences that the law calls for. However, if
someone asked me where the school zones are, I would probably say that they
are where the schools are. That seems like a no-brainer, but apparently it
isn't. I never would have guessed that the parking lot where the Great
Barrington youth allegedly performed their bad acts is in a school zone.
Where's the school?
Apparently there's a bona-fide school in some rooms very close by. Who
knew? This is not a trivial point.
To the contrary, it's central to whether or not justice is being done, and
if the law is actually being applied as intended.
If the successful sting operation had been conducted a couple of blocks
elsewhere, the first-time offenders would apparently be looking at a range
of serious consequences short of jail time. That seems reasonable. If they
stay out of trouble, the taxpayers save a lot of money and the offenders
can return to learning how to be constructive citizens.
If they continue to screw up, then the consequences escalate until
incarceration becomes the best remedy. As the situation now stands, it
seems like our DA is painted into a corner, or at least is afraid to
venture out of the corner.
Poor and distorted public policy is the result.
Arbitrarily sending the first-timers to the slammer for two years is
excessively punitive and expensive, not to mention counterproductive. After
all, jails are not noted for being incubators for tomorrow's finest. That's
why incarceration is, by design, generally not applied against
first-timers, especially youthful ones, under the circumstances. It's poor
logic to claim that incarcerating these first-timers for two years is equal
justice, when most first-timers are not incarcerated. The law and order
constituency, which I actually belong to, is misguided this time. If we
step back and objectively evaluate what's going on here, we will all see
that what's out of order is the way this situation is being handled. The
school zone law needs to be amended so that it will be confined to only
achieving what it was designed for, which is to keep drugs away from
schools by making it extremely painful to do otherwise, and that's a good
policy.
But the situation at hand seems to be a horse of another color, maybe even
curious colors.
JEFFREY H. HERMAN
West Stockbridge
Member Comments |
No member comments available...