News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: PUB LTE: SD8 Adopts Controversial Drug And Alcohol |
Title: | CN BC: PUB LTE: SD8 Adopts Controversial Drug And Alcohol |
Published On: | 2005-07-06 |
Source: | Valley Voice, The (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-16 00:46:22 |
SD8 ADOPTS CONTROVERSIAL DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY
The School District #8 Board of Trustees adopted a controversial policy on
the use of illegal drugs and alcohol at a recent board meeting. They went
ahead despite the objections of parents.
There has been much research that points to the ineffectiveness of
suspensions as a form of discipline. The Ministry of Education's own
document says that some of the unintended side-effects of suspensions are
diminished self-esteem, diminished self-discipline, increased avoidance
behaviours, decreased academic success, increased drop-out rate, increased
stress level, increased anger levels, feelings of discouragement and
increased risk of suicide.
Parents are also concerned that by using suspensions, the example set for
other students is that the consequence for using illegal drugs and alcohol
in school is a holiday from school in front of the TV or Nintendo, or a
chance to hang out downtown. Students contemplating use need to see a
consequence that forces them to address their issues and to take
responsibility for their actions. What kind of an example is a consequence
that doesn't work? The students that would be worried about being
suspended probably aren't the ones that need the example anyway.
The school board should be developing a policy that encourages effective
discipline, and support for our most vulnerable students. This policy does
not do that.
It did not pass without dissent, though. Two trustees expressed concerns
that this policy conflicts with the Student Conduct and Discipline
Policy. One trustee was concerned that the board has not done research on
whether the use of suspensions in this district has been effective. She
asked if students have learned their lesson after one suspension or are we
getting repeat offenders. Both of these trustees voted against the adoption
of this policy.
On Thursday, June 23 at the last DPAC meeting of the year, parents
encouraged the DPAC executive to continue to lobby for a policy that
focuses on alternatives to suspensions.
Parents have made it very clear that suspensions should only be used as a
last resort.
Lenora Trenaman, DPAC President
The School District #8 Board of Trustees adopted a controversial policy on
the use of illegal drugs and alcohol at a recent board meeting. They went
ahead despite the objections of parents.
There has been much research that points to the ineffectiveness of
suspensions as a form of discipline. The Ministry of Education's own
document says that some of the unintended side-effects of suspensions are
diminished self-esteem, diminished self-discipline, increased avoidance
behaviours, decreased academic success, increased drop-out rate, increased
stress level, increased anger levels, feelings of discouragement and
increased risk of suicide.
Parents are also concerned that by using suspensions, the example set for
other students is that the consequence for using illegal drugs and alcohol
in school is a holiday from school in front of the TV or Nintendo, or a
chance to hang out downtown. Students contemplating use need to see a
consequence that forces them to address their issues and to take
responsibility for their actions. What kind of an example is a consequence
that doesn't work? The students that would be worried about being
suspended probably aren't the ones that need the example anyway.
The school board should be developing a policy that encourages effective
discipline, and support for our most vulnerable students. This policy does
not do that.
It did not pass without dissent, though. Two trustees expressed concerns
that this policy conflicts with the Student Conduct and Discipline
Policy. One trustee was concerned that the board has not done research on
whether the use of suspensions in this district has been effective. She
asked if students have learned their lesson after one suspension or are we
getting repeat offenders. Both of these trustees voted against the adoption
of this policy.
On Thursday, June 23 at the last DPAC meeting of the year, parents
encouraged the DPAC executive to continue to lobby for a policy that
focuses on alternatives to suspensions.
Parents have made it very clear that suspensions should only be used as a
last resort.
Lenora Trenaman, DPAC President
Member Comments |
No member comments available...